Teams

PARK TERRACE CM8.5A

2025 COMBO · Men 8.5

12 players · average NTRP 4.12 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-10-02vs GOLD RIVER RC CM8.5BSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJeff Peterson / Phi Dinh vs Andrea Sartori / Rajan Gosain6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPaul Gee / Erik Nelson vs Steven Crain / Loredo Lawsin6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-09-27vs SHELDON PK CM8.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesPaul Gee / Jeffrey Fong vs Allen Hoang / Phuong Truong6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPhi Dinh / Jonathan Yip vs Huy Le / Thuan Nguyen4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJeff Peterson / Aleksandr A Bgatov vs Tay Nguyen / Dinh Tran2-6, 6-7
2025-09-21vs GOLD RIVER RC CM8.5BWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Mundhenk / Jeffrey Fong vs Alexander Charn / Kurt Munch6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesOscar Watson / Ben Edwards vs Nazary Yatsenyak / Chandra Mahadevan6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAleksandr A Bgatov / Alex Bychkoviak vs Aaron Prince / Todd Humphrey6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.93 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.38
Jeffrey Fong
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Erik Nelson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.00
Chris Mundhenk
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.99
Phi Dinh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.91
Paul Gee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.90
Jonathan Yip
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.89
Aleksandr A Bgatov
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.89
Alex Bychkoviak
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.82
Oscar Watson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Kelvin Kwan
published
3.66
Keyan Fallahi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Matt Schmitt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Bychkoviak + Aleksandr A Bgatov6253% games−10.1% vs expected
Paul Gee + Jeffrey Fong303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jeffrey Fong
14W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%79%20%
4.38
Erik Nelson
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
31%69%<1%
4.07
4.5
Chris Mundhenk
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
4.00
4
Phi Dinh
10W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
Paul Gee
17W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
Jonathan Yip
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
77%23%<1%
3.90
4
Aleksandr A Bgatov
27W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Alex Bychkoviak
27W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
3.89
Oscar Watson
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%9%
3.82
Kelvin Kwan
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.76
Keyan Fallahi
8W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.66
Matt Schmitt
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.