Teams

PLEASANTON 18AM3.5G

2024 ADULT 18&Over · Men's 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 3.29 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-15vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5DLost 01
L#1 SinglesRamesh Konitineni vs Jesse Terrel-Perez2-6, 2-6
2024-06-11vs DOUGHERTY VALLEY HS 18AM3.5ALost 01
L#3 DoublesChris Picht / Ramesh Konitineni vs Vishy Venkitakrishnan / Kenneth Young3-6, 3-6
2024-05-30vs FREMONT TC 18AM3.5BWon 10
W#2 SinglesRamesh Konitineni vs Prathap Kudupu6-3, 6-1
2024-05-15vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5CLost 01
L#1 SinglesRamesh Konitineni vs Mukundan Swaminathan1-6, 1-6
2024-04-28vs PLEASANTON 18AM3.5DLost 01
L#2 SinglesRamesh Konitineni vs Rohit Khanna3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-04-21Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRamesh Konitineni vs Devin Villarosa2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Nikhil Prakash
published
3.39
Renato Castro
published
3.38
Gabriel Mangonon
published 3.5
3.34
Ramesh Konitineni
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published 3.5
3.23
Tom Betts
published
3.19
Chris Picht
published 3.5
3.17
David Hood
published 3.5
3.10
Sayon Majumdar
published
3.10
3.03
2.87
Chandra Mundra
published 3
2.68
Richard Morgin
published
Jason Ehrlich
published
Michael Regan
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nikhil Prakash
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.57
Renato Castro
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Gabriel Mangonon
14W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Ramesh Konitineni
44W–38L career · 10 lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Tom Betts
12W–28L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Chris Picht
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
David Hood
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.17
Sayon Majumdar
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.10
Moorthi Kothandaraman
11W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.10
3
Chandrashekhar Muni
14W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.03
3
Chandra Mundra
13W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Andres Cajiao Canfield
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Morgin
3W–18L career · no lines in 2024
9%91%1%
2.68
Jason Ehrlich
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michael Regan
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.