Teams

BC-Kramer/ChristopherBall

2023 MIXED 18 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Mixed 18 & Over - 7.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.54 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for BC Mixed 18 & Over - 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Richard Butlig
published 4
3.58
Jennifer Giordano
published
3.54
Tanya Drawer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.37
Vanessa Hyttenberg
published
3.36
David Cobb
published 3.5
3.32
Christine Ball
published 3.5
3.30
Tracey Cloud
published
David Bradley
published 3.5
3.25
Colleen Post
published 3.5
3.23
Allison Brandt
published 3.5
3.22
Estuardo Meza
published
3.17
AJ Poulin
published 3.5
3.15
Pamela Tansavatdi
published 3.5
3.13
Sarah Robarts
published
3.12
Martha Zane
published
3.09
Christopher Ball
published 3.5
3.07
Lynn Abelson
published 3.5
3.03
Paul Huang
published
2.92
Todd Springer
published
2.82
Ron Brandt
published
Joyce Nikolic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Colleen Post + Estuardo Meza5259% games+12.8% vs expected
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig + Richard Butlig10365% games+8.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Richard Butlig
101W–49L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.86
Jennifer Giordano
9W–9L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Tanya Drawer
106W–90L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
3.54
Vanessa Hyttenberg
10W–21L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
David Cobb
10W–10L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Christine Ball
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.32
Tracey Cloud
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
David Bradley
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Colleen Post
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.25
3.5
Allison Brandt
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Estuardo Meza
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%2%
3.22
3.5
AJ Poulin
3W–12L career · no lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.17
3.5
Pamela Tansavatdi
11W–19L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.15
Sarah Robarts
2W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%81%<1%
3.13
Martha Zane
8W–13L career · no lines in 2023
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Christopher Ball
2W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
3.5
Lynn Abelson
49W–79L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.07
3
Evangeline Roxas-Butlig
49W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.05
Paul Huang
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.03
Todd Springer
3W–13L career · no lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
2.92
Ron Brandt
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Joyce Nikolic
0W–9L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.