Teams

LCTA39/Arena/LTP-DI

LCTA 39 & Over Fall League · 39 & over Fall - Women - 2.5 Day

11 players · average NTRP 2.50 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings7 teams · 39 & over Fall - Women - 2.5 Day
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LCTA39/Hutchinson/I'On000000
2LCTA39/Ledlie/Maybank000000
3LCTA39/Potter/CTC000000
4LCTA39/Arena/LTP-DI000000
5LCTA39/Westcott/Creekside000000
6LCTA39/Chapin/Creekside000000
7LCTA39/Stefl/Dunes West000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.57
Lisa Grimmer
published
2.33
Lindsey Arena
published
2.30
Alex Earls
published 2.5
2.30
Kimberly Pearson
published
2.29
Kelly Shannon
published
2.24
Robin Russell
published
2.24
Sarah Vernon
published
2.24
Andrea Cline
published 2.5
2.17
Helene Cote
published
1.98
Kathryn Frailey
published
Meredith Shoger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Russell + Sarah Vernon4647% games+6.0% vs expected
Robin Russell + Lindsey Arena044 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Grimmer + Lindsey Arena213 matchesnot enough data
Alex Earls + Lindsey Arena033 matchesnot enough data
Robin Russell + Kimberly Pearson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lisa Grimmer
53W–69L career · no lines in 2026
0%32%68%
2.57
Lindsey Arena
22W–46L career · no lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
2.5
Alex Earls
10W–23L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Kimberly Pearson
16W–24L career · no lines in 2026
0%92%8%
2.30
Kelly Shannon
8W–24L career · no lines in 2026
0%93%7%
2.29
Robin Russell
30W–45L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Sarah Vernon
21W–29L career · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Andrea Cline
1W–6L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
Helene Cote
8W–32L career · no lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Kathryn Frailey
2W–17L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Meredith Shoger
0W–5L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.