Teams

Bray/Memphis

2026 Combo 55 & Over - Memphis · 6.5 55 & Over Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 3 played
Sep 13 12:00 PM
Leftwich Tennis Center
Sep 20 12:00 PM
C.O. Franklin Park
2026-08-30vs Miller/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesJohn Lancaster / Kevin Womack vs Kevin Miller / Jon Reesman6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDoug Wilson / Glenn Neilson vs James Ensell / Nizwer Husain2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesDavid Bray / Terry Bartley vs Rob Dannemiller / John Castany2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-26vs Miller/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesROBERT LEBLANC / John Manshack vs Rob Dannemiller / John Castany4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHunter Ivy / John Lancaster vs James Ensell / Tron Huynh5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDavid Bray / Kevin Womack vs Nizwer Husain / Dharmaraj Coona6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-09vs Miller/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesJohn Lancaster / Kevin Womack vs Ted Lapina / Kevin Miller4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesHunter Ivy / Robert O'Bryan vs James Ensell / Rob Dannemiller3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 55 & Over Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Terry Bartley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.53
ROBERT LEBLANC
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kevin Womack
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Kevin Roedel
published
3.27
Hunter Ivy
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
John Manshack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Robert O'Bryan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
John Lancaster
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.87
Glenn Neilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.71
David Bray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Curtis Higgins
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Lancaster + Hunter Ivy134 matchesnot enough data
Terry Bartley + ROBERT LEBLANC314 matchesnot enough data
John Manshack + Kevin Womack314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terry Bartley
9W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%14%86%
3.65
ROBERT LEBLANC
23W–16L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Kevin Womack
22W–33L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Kevin Roedel
26W–16L career · no lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
3.38
Hunter Ivy
7W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
John Manshack
40W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.13
Robert O'Bryan
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%58%42%
2.97
John Lancaster
13W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
Glenn Neilson
17W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
David Bray
8W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Curtis Higgins
7W–7L career · no lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.68

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.