Teams

Forehands And Grunts

2026 Corpus Christi 18 & Over USTA Summer Mixed League · 9.0 Mixed

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-08-06vs 6PackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLauren Hill / Darryl Moore vs Brooke Bolinger / Dale Loveland III2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesReno Vega / Natalie Villarreal vs Nicholas Loveland / Laura Konecne4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-07-30vs 6PackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEmily Hellums / Robert Sandate vs Brooke Bolinger / Dale Loveland III0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLauren Hill / Reno Vega vs Nicholas Loveland / Zoe Mcdonald6-3, 6-1
2026-07-23vs 6PackLost 12
W#1 DoublesDarryl Moore / Lauren Hill vs Nicholas Loveland / Zoe Mcdonald6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRonald Elizondo / Rebecca Pina vs Dale Loveland III / Brooke Bolinger4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesRobert Sandate / Natalie Villarreal vs Carl Hellums / Laura Konecne4-6, 3-6
2026-07-09vs 6PackSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Hellums / Robert Sandate vs Carl Hellums / Laura Konecne7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesReno Vega / Natalie Villarreal vs Nicholas Loveland / Zoe Mcdonald5-7, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Darryl Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Ronald Elizondo
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.84
Natalie Villarreal
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.84
Rebecca Pina
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Robert Sandate
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published
3.73
Reno Vega
usually #2 Doubles 54%, also #3 Doubles 39% · published
3.69
Emily Hellums
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Lindsey Reynolds
published
Lauren Hill
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Darryl Moore
5W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
Ronald Elizondo
12W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
82%18%<1%
3.87
Natalie Villarreal
19W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
Rebecca Pina
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2026
1%87%12%
3.84
Robert Sandate
15W–23L career · 9 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
Reno Vega
13W–41L career · 13 lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Emily Hellums
38W–24L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.69
Lindsey Reynolds
11W–4L career · no lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.57
Lauren Hill
11W–8L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.