Teams

FRIEDMAN/ MACDONALD

2021 Loudoun Doubles Afternoon Winter Women · Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.21 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-03-26Lost 02
L#1 DoublesElle Sullivant / Julie Collier vs Jennifer Barnett / Heidi Funke1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAnne McDonald / Genevieve Gilinger vs Ashley Harper / Jennifer Malloy6-7, 3-6
2021-03-24vs MCMULLENLost 01
L#2 DoublesGenevieve Gilinger / Elle Sullivant vs Michelle Grande / Lindsey Frye2-6, 2-6
2021-03-19vs KOTTER/ O'DONNELLLost 12
L#1 DoublesNiki Friedman / Angela Tomaszewski vs Susan Ohneiser / Tina Woods3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Anne Marie Randolph vs Lisa Furgal / Karen Sullivan4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBarb Long / Elle Sullivant vs Paula Garrison / Caroline Mia Lee0-6, 4-6
2021-03-18vs DRAKEWon 10
W#1 DoublesLaura Forster / Stephanie Frauen vs Donna James / Karen Ziff6-3, 7-5
2021-03-11Split 11
L#2 DoublesAnne McDonald / Elle Sullivant vs April Gimenez / Caroline Hedges5-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Christiane Lavin vs Kathy Haberman / Jae Berlik6-4, 6-2
2021-03-04vs BUTLERSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLaura Forster / Stephanie Frauen vs Kimberly Butler / Jean Garrell7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesKatie Plofchan / Genevieve Gilinger vs Julie Kyle / Karen Flikeid5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Doubles Afternoon Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Christina Treacy
published 3.5
3.25
Anne Marie Randolph
published 3.5
3.11
Julie Collier
published
3.09
Angela Tomaszewski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Niki Friedman
published
2.83
Katie Plofchan
published
2.75
Anne McDonald
published 3
2.73
Elle Sullivant
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.64
Genevieve Gilinger
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Frauen + Angela Tomaszewski2744% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Christina Treacy
79W–43L career · no lines in 2021
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Anne Marie Randolph
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Julie Collier
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Angela Tomaszewski
111W–105L career · 1 line in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.09
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%36%64%
3.05
Niki Friedman
7W–9L career · no lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
2.90
Katie Plofchan
9W–2L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%10%
2.83
3
Anne McDonald
11W–13L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.75
3
Elle Sullivant
78W–157L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Genevieve Gilinger
24W–29L career · 3 lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.