Teams

TWeber-DUR

2026 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 4 played
Sep 14 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
Sep 21 8:00 PM
Garrett Road Tennis Courts
Sep 28 6:30 PM
Southern Boundaries Tennis Courts
2026-08-26vs JRoss.8.5C-DURLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Heetderks / Button Hall vs Emily Ratliff / Tiffany Langino2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristin Daniels / Chace Ogle vs Zoe Dubrow / Sindhu Shivaji1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesBetsy Shane / Hannah Silverstein vs Valerie Acre / Lina Habib5-7, 2-6
2026-08-24vs MLong.8.5C-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesButton Hall / Kathryn Pollak vs Dallas Knight / Katya Lundberg5-7, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLiz Chen / Elizabeth Heetderks vs Terri Tarrant / Wendy Lindberg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2026-08-10vs APlachco.18C-DURLost 03
L#1 DoublesTess Weber / Elizabeth Heetderks vs Smita Paranjape / Briana Oliver2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBetsy Shane / Lynise Devance vs Cheryl Reid / Barbara Timinskas6-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesButton Hall / Christin Daniels vs Ana Plachco / Meghan Howard6-7, 4-6
2026-08-03vs JPerry-CHTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesHannah Silverstein / Karen Scherr vs Brook Holton Sheahan / Brooke Melott3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Jarvis / Tess Weber vs Adrianne Leinbach / Jenny Perry5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesButton Hall / Lynise Devance vs Sheridan Meltsner / Lynne Davis4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 18 & Over Combo 8.5 Women Eve
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1APlachco.18C-DUR1142559
2MLong.8.5C-DUR1142762
3MPaul.8.5C-DUR1133861
4JRoss.8.5C-DUR1124850
5TWeber-DUR02061277

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Tess Weber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.03
Chace Ogle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.90
Elizabeth Heetderks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.77
Lynise Devance
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.72
Karen Scherr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.70
Liz Chen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.70
Hannah Silverstein
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.62
Atsuko Duncan
published 4
3.58
Button Hall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.49
Olivia Lara
published
3.47
Christin Daniels
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Kathryn Pollak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Betsy Shane
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.45
Amber Jarvis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Tess Weber
5W–11L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
4.16
4
Chace Ogle
12W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
4.03
Elizabeth Heetderks
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.90
4
Lynise Devance
126W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.77
Karen Scherr
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Liz Chen
22W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.70
4
Hannah Silverstein
67W–104L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Atsuko Duncan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
4
Button Hall
223W–223L career · 4 lines in 2026
28%72%<1%
3.58
Olivia Lara
2W–5L career · no lines in 2026
54%46%<1%
3.49
4
Christin Daniels
24W–67L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
Kathryn Pollak
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
4
Betsy Shane
0W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.47
3.5
Amber Jarvis
90W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.45

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.