Teams

Sarasota - Seminole Lakes/Domingo

2021 Sarasota Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 W Wednesday

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_5

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-02-24vs Venetian MikeWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Renee Murno vs Brenda Mike / Christine Santucci6-2, 6-4
2021-02-17vs Sarasota National MargagnoniWon 10
W#1 DoublesRenee Murno / Diane DeGurian vs Joyce Dulworth / Nancy Sincoski6-1, 6-1
2021-02-10vs Mission Valley ZentzWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Murno / Diane DeGurian vs Susan Terry / Ann Larabee6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Ruth Coburn vs Shelley Heller / CHIEKO OHRSTROM6-4, 6-2
2021-02-03vs Laurel Oak RobbinsWon 10
W#2 DoublesRuth Coburn / Cheryl Domingo vs Audrey Robbins / Lori Bartkus6-2, 6-0
2021-01-27vs Plantation TippettWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Renee Murno vs Jacki Kilian / Vicki Tippett6-2, 6-1
2021-01-20vs Sarasota National MargagnoniWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Murno / Diane DeGurian vs Traci Holmes / Suzanne Brosnan6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Diane Crews vs Nancy Sincoski / Ethel Gilkey6-1, 6-2
2021-01-13vs Venetian MikeWon 10
W#1 DoublesCheryl Domingo / Diane DeGurian vs Brenda Mike / Christine Santucci6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 W Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Diane DeGurian
published 4.5
3.79
Diane Crews
published 4
3.31
Cheryl Domingo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Barbara Robinson
published 3.5
3.26
Debra Peterson
published 3.5
Janet Kaplan
published
Mae Nelson Stone
published
Renee Murno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Ruth Coburn
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Renee Murno + Cheryl Domingo7170% gamesnot enough data
Cheryl Domingo + Diane Crews123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diane DeGurian
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%94%5%
4.29
4
Diane Crews
6W–4L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.79
3.5
Cheryl Domingo
104W–57L career · 6 lines in 2021
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
Barbara Robinson
8W–10L career · no lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Debra Peterson
2W–8L career · type S · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
3.26
Janet Kaplan
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Mae Nelson Stone
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Renee Murno
78W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
Ruth Coburn
1W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.