Teams

Langford HCC

2024 Pine Belt Singles League · 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 2.75 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-14vs Hanson HCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesYancy Popicg vs Crystie Aultman6-2, 7-5
L#2 SinglesLauren McWilliams vs Kelsea Weldon2-6, 6-7
W#3 SinglesKatie Love Owen vs Mary Hays6-2, 6-1
2024-12-07vs 2.5 NorthwoodSplit 11
L#1 SinglesLauren McWilliams vs Jenni Barr2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChelle Langford vs Amanda Snowden6-1, 6-4
2024-12-01vs Fins 25 SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesChelle Langford vs Kaitlyn Hennessey3-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesAmanda Stephens vs Ashley Vance6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesLauren McWilliams vs Kayla Holcomb6-3, 6-2
2024-11-19vs Fins 25 SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesAmanda Stephens vs Kaitlyn Hennessey7-5, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesChelle Langford vs Mabry Shook6-4, 6-4
W#3 SinglesYancy Popicg vs Kayla Holcomb6-0, 6-0
2024-11-18vs 2.5 NorthwoodSplit 11
L#1 SinglesChelle Langford vs Jenni Barr6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesLauren McWilliams vs Mary Lauren Deweese6-3, 6-0
2024-11-05vs Hanson HCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesAmanda Stephens vs Crystie Aultman6-4, 6-3
L#2 SinglesChelle Langford vs Kelsea Weldon6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.53 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.83
Yancy Popicg
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
2.64
Chelle Langford
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.62
Katie Love Owen
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
2.45
Amanda Stephens
usually #3 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.10
Lauren McWilliams
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelle Langford + Yancy Popicg303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Yancy Popicg
24W–5L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Chelle Langford
41W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Katie Love Owen
10W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
2.5
Amanda Stephens
10W–7L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%64%36%
2.45
Lauren McWilliams
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.