Teams

TZimmer (PPRSC)

2025 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-05-01vs KChapman (Piper Glen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesChuck Norton / Craig Menninger vs Kenneth Godfrey / Joseph Garner6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTroy Smith / Zac Dean vs Matthew Wellman / Kristoff Goson5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEric Hatley / Matthew Black vs Jason Spires / Curt Waldthausen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-04-23vs KChapman (Piper Glen)Won 10
W#3 DoublesZac Dean / Robert Bush vs Jason Spires / Christopher Bennett6-0, 6-1
2025-03-23vs KChapman (Piper Glen)Lost 03
L#2 DoublesDavid Moore / Trevor Zimmer vs Joseph Garner / Jacob Colley1-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesCraig Menninger vs Nicholas Munn5-7, 0-6
L#3 DoublesEric Hatley / Butch Mayer vs Jason Colgate / Jason Spires1-6, 5-7
2025-02-27vs KChapman (Piper Glen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTrevor Zimmer / Craig Menninger vs Kris Chapman / Kenneth Godfrey6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesChuck Norton vs Curtis Crews6-2
L#3 DoublesButch Mayer / Eric Hatley vs William John McGough Jr. / Jacob Colley4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Men - Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Trevor Zimmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Chuck Norton
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.94
Craig Menninger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3
Eric Hatley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
Butch Mayer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Matthew Black
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Zac Dean
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Trevor Zimmer + Chuck Norton3258% games+5.5% vs expected
Butch Mayer + Eric Hatley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Trevor Zimmer
19W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Chuck Norton
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Craig Menninger
23W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Eric Hatley
0W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Butch Mayer
4W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.56
Matthew Black
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Zac Dean
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.