Teams

Steinhausler/Memphis

2025 Adult 18 & Over Early Start League - Memphis · 2.5 Women

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-15vs Galdieri/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesLindsay Miklos / Kayleigh Turner vs Gwendolyn Mrva / Jeanne Cannon4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesTammy Evangelisti vs Chelsea Jewell4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesChristine Meisenheimer / Erin Shackelford vs Carolyn Labonia / Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin0-6, 2-6
2024-10-23vs Witte/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesTamara Steinhausler / Lyndsay Gronostaj vs Martha Carter / Chancey Thompson6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesTammy Evangelisti vs Laura Weaver6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKayleigh Turner / Meredith Philips vs Rachel Montague / Callie Wesson6-2, 6-4
2024-10-15vs Carkeet/MemphisWon 30
W#1 DoublesTamara Steinhausler / Nancy Chandrasekaran vs Whitney Greer / Suzanne Lomax6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLyndsay Gronostaj vs Mary Margaret Posey6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Shackelford / Samantha Rohlinger vs Leigh Ann Carkeet / Jennifer Dye6-3, 6-2
2024-10-08vs Avant/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristina Pike / Samantha Rohlinger vs Katie McDermott / Krystal Shaw0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesRebecca Slater vs Alexandra Morin6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMeredith Philips / Erin Shackelford vs Lauren Parks / Summer Farmer7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.49 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Christina Pike
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.62
Lyndsay Gronostaj
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.62
Nancy Chandrasekaran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.61
Rebecca Slater
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.55
Tamara Steinhausler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Erin Shackelford
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Tammy Evangelisti
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.44
Meredith Philips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.40
Kayleigh Turner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.37
Lindsay Miklos
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.36
Samantha Rohlinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Christine Meisenheimer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay Miklos + Samantha Rohlinger2542% games−2.6% vs expected
Tamara Steinhausler + Nancy Chandrasekaran213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Christina Pike
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Lyndsay Gronostaj
23W–28L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%19%81%
2.62
Nancy Chandrasekaran
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
20%79%<1%
2.62
Rebecca Slater
13W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Tamara Steinhausler
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
Erin Shackelford
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
Tammy Evangelisti
11W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%56%44%
2.48
Meredith Philips
4W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Kayleigh Turner
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Lindsay Miklos
10W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%83%17%
2.37
Samantha Rohlinger
22W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%84%16%
2.36
2.5
Christine Meisenheimer
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.