Teams

CDTA S 18&OW3.5 10.Wilm Harrison Sun 11 $22

1Summer 18&O WN · WE

19 players · average NTRP 3.36 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#2 DoublesClaudine Seidel / Michelle Yeh vs Sue Christianson / Jennifer Calliss6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Quinn / Nancy Spring vs Mindey Johnson / Laurie Sandman5-7, 0-6
2026-06-28vs CDTA S 18&OW3.5 6.FV Werts Mon 7 $25Split 11
L#1 DoublesJeanne Tromp / Michelle Yeh vs Yukiko Juretic / Diane Thomason5-7, 4-5
W#1 SinglesClaire Tramm vs Ariel Cantieri6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Spring / Nancy Dolan vs Rachel Singer / Julie Gordon5-7, 2-5
L#1 DoublesAnn Roberts / Maggie Lampe vs Allison Milmoe / Nicole Perso7-5, 2-4, 0-1
W#1 SinglesClaire Tramm vs Denise Rippetoe-Reed6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesNancy Spring / Simone Brown vs Elena Chang / Chris Nelson4-6, 3-5
W#1 SinglesClaire Tramm vs Maria Unwala6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDenise de Silva / Michelle Yeh vs Rebecca De Leon / Jeanie Szmanda6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesClaire Tramm vs Katie Fishman6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNancy Dolan / Sarah Haas vs Julia Happel / Vicki Johnson6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesNancy Spring / Ginny Lazarus vs Stefanie Wolfson / Julie Tom6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · WE
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Dawn Kenny
published 3.5
3.46
Claudine Seidel
published 3.5
3.41
Liz Hayes
published 3.5
3.41
Jessica Gross
published 3.5
3.32
Claire Tramm
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.30
Maggie Lampe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.26
Christi Harrison
published 3.5
3.26
Denise de Silva
published 3.5
Ann Roberts
published 3.5
3.25
Kelli Brinkman
published 3.5
3.13
Nancy Dolan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Michelle Yeh
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
3.02
Ann Weller
published 3.5
2.98
Nancy Spring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Ginny Lazarus
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Beth Goldberg
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christi Harrison + Michelle Yeh3453% games+7.8% vs expected
Christi Harrison + Jeanne Tromp3548% games+6.2% vs expected
Michelle Yeh + Kelli Brinkman6756% games+1.7% vs expected
Dawn Kenny + Jessica Gross5457% games−0.7% vs expected
Nancy Dolan + Christi Harrison4153% games−0.7% vs expected
Nancy Spring + Christi Harrison5252% games−2.5% vs expected
Nancy Dolan + Denise de Silva5549% gamesnot enough data
Ginny Lazarus + Nancy Dolan5357% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dawn Kenny
20W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.57
3.5
Claudine Seidel
43W–15L career · no lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Liz Hayes
25W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Jessica Gross
74W–47L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3
Claire Tramm
29W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
Maggie Lampe
18W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Christi Harrison
54W–48L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Denise de Silva
17W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.26
3.5
Ann Roberts
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Kelli Brinkman
45W–18L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
Nancy Dolan
69W–88L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%<1%
3.13
Michelle Yeh
68W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3.5
Ann Weller
0W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Nancy Spring
11W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
2.98
3
Ginny Lazarus
75W–101L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Beth Goldberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.