Teams

LA - Queen Bees

2024 USTA Adult 55 & Over – LA · LA - Women 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.43 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-08-25vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesMilinda McNeely / Patricia Lombard vs Dena Siegel / Helen Hollien6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2024-08-24Won 10
W#3 DoublesNora Suk / Susan Kneafsey vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-07-06vs SoCal/Slaughter/55&Over7.0WLost 01
L#2 DoublesDiamantina Jannone -Kim / Milinda McNeely vs Sandra Nervig / Jady Vonderlieth6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-06-29vs LA - Downtown AcesWon 10
W#2 DoublesLara Fermanis / Milinda McNeely vs Susan Mondt / Lauri Brenner6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Michele Weiss
published
Dina Phillips
published 4
Irene Anderson
published 4
3.72
Lara Fermanis
published
3.56
Joni Martino
published
3.51
Susan Kneafsey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Milinda McNeely
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Anne Kim
published 3.5
2.95
MARY WOODWARD
published
2.79
MayLin Tao
published
Beverly Gatica
published 3
Diana Nyad
published 3
2.75
Stefanie Hall
published
2.69
Michele Sanchez
published
2.66
Diane Wagner
published 3
2.63
Renee Mochkatel
published
Laura Shirley
published
Michele Werdin
published
Patricia Lombard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARY WOODWARD + Diane Wagner033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michele Weiss
11W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Dina Phillips
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Irene Anderson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lara Fermanis
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Joni Martino
9W–18L career · no lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
3.56
Susan Kneafsey
30W–34L career · 1 line in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Milinda McNeely
26W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Anne Kim
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
MARY WOODWARD
3W–9L career · no lines in 2024
65%35%<1%
2.95
MayLin Tao
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
2.79
3
Beverly Gatica
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Diana Nyad
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefanie Hall
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Michele Sanchez
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
2.69
3
Diane Wagner
7W–11L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
2.66
Renee Mochkatel
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
2.63
Laura Shirley
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Werdin
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Lombard
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.