Teams

Stewart - RS Clay

2024 Escambia Mixed 40 & Over · 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-02-20vs Crooke - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesLubomir Kaderjak / Akiko Ichimasa vs Kirk Bradley / Julie Schneidt7-6, 6-2
2024-02-13vs Marino - RS ClayLost 01
L#2 DoublesRuss Parris / Renee Bradford vs Calvin Moore / Tracey Mcclurd4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-01-30vs Crooke - SHLWon 10
W#1 DoublesAkiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak vs Tyson Dunkelberger / Shaner Garner Crooke6-1, 6-1
2024-01-23vs Marino - RS ClayWon 20
W#1 DoublesAkiko Ichimasa / Lubomir Kaderjak vs Carl Miller / Ashle Tran6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRenee Bradford / Michael Yager vs Dawn Marino / Kevin Groom6-1, 6-3
2024-01-09vs Crooke - SHLLost 01
L#1 DoublesRenee Bradford / Michael Yager vs Ken McCurdy / Jami Steinmetz6-4, 5-7, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Lubomir Kaderjak
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.83
Russ Parris
published
3.76
Renee Bradford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Michael Yager
published
3.67
Whitney Sumrall
published
3.61
Angela Stewart
published 4
3.56
Glenn Shane
published
3.54
Akiko Ichimasa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.31
Eric Stewart
published
3.13
Timothy Sumrall
published
William Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lubomir Kaderjak + Akiko Ichimasa36370% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Lubomir Kaderjak
183W–34L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%85%14%
4.35
Russ Parris
4W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Renee Bradford
134W–162L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%4%
3.76
Michael Yager
14W–15L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Whitney Sumrall
8W–4L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Angela Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
3.61
Glenn Shane
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Akiko Ichimasa
78W–10L career · type A · 3 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
3.54
Eric Stewart
18W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Timothy Sumrall
4W–7L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
William Morris
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.