Teams

A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd

2026 NEOTA Adult 18 & Over Summer · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer

15 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-07-16vs A18 4.0M 1 SP SteereWon 32
L#1 DoublesIan Kidd / Ryan Wandling vs Vincent Gambaccini / Gaven Cona4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeshav Mody vs Peter Biondi6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRyan Garst / Chito Lam vs Brennan Albainy / Casey Miller1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNat Weiner vs Joe Demboski6-3, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSHENGYONG WANG / Vish Chandran vs Christian Droz / Milan Dayalal6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2026-07-09vs A18 4.0M 1 PM SoursLost 04
L#1 SinglesKeshav Mody vs Luke Butcher4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesVu Nguyen / SHENGYONG WANG vs Holden Schmid / Joshua Lemerman7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesNat Weiner vs Daniel Sehlhorst2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPranav Srinivasan / Scott Bunge vs Matt Hutchison / Samuel Dalessandro4-6, 5-7
2026-07-02vs A18 4.0M 1 AS SmithLost 14
L#1 DoublesVish Chandran / Scott Bunge vs Garrett Ranney / Brock Ranney1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Christopher Tunnell5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKeneth Conerly / Pranav Srinivasan vs Saxon Ranney / John Dilyard3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesNat Weiner vs Max Casto4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesChristopher Lesher / Ryan Garst vs Paul Self / Jason Self6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2026-06-25vs A18 4.0M 2 NC PaulinoLost 23
L#1 DoublesChristopher Lesher / Jimmy Jeffries vs Michael Williams / Michael Klapchar6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKeneth Conerly vs Miroslav Mihajlovic6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrendan Ho / Vu Nguyen vs David Hofsess / Gabe Povick6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesIan Kidd vs Sage Coombs6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChito Lam / Lee Sulzener vs Daniel Amato / Luke DeLand2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-18vs A18 4.0M 2 TP LefflerWon 50
W#1 DoublesVu Nguyen / Lee Sulzener vs Josh Derrig / Matthew Debiec4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Stephen DeBacco6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrendan Ho / Joseph Mendez vs Andrew Leffler / JJ Burchfield6-3, 6-1
W#2 SinglesKeshav Mody vs Christopher Galasso7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRyan Garst / Christopher Lesher vs Edward Raffel / Ben Vasunia6-3, 6-0
2026-06-11vs A18 4.0M 2 CC BennyLost 13
L#1 DoublesKeneth Conerly / Vish Chandran vs Gurucharan Ganapathi / William Hill3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Billy Kennedy6-4, 3-0
L#2 SinglesNat Weiner vs Matthew Horwich2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesBrendan Ho / Pranav Srinivasan vs Thomas Lindsey / JOSEPH BENNY1-6, 5-7
2026-06-04vs A18 4.0M 2 LT2 SimonLost 13
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ho / Keneth Conerly vs Akin Fashina / Jordan Ragland0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Philip Borders4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJimmy Jeffries / Christopher Lesher vs Nate Fockler / Ryan McClure2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Kealy / Vu Nguyen vs Michael Tolva / Adam Hosner3-6, 3-6
2026-05-28vs A18 4.0M 1 SP SteereSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ho / Pranav Srinivasan vs Gaven Cona / Brian Steere2-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Casey Miller6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lesher / Charles Kealy vs Joe Demboski / Jason Ganim6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesNat Weiner vs Brennan Albainy7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-05-21vs A18 4.0M 1 PM SoursSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrendan Ho / Lee Sulzener vs Blake Sours / Roger Boyer2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Holden Schmid6-2, 7-5
W#2 DoublesChristopher Lesher / Vish Chandran vs Joshua Lemerman / Glen Andrianov6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCharles Kealy vs Bobby Harmon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-05-14vs A18 4.0M 1 AS SmithLost 04
L#1 DoublesLee Sulzener / Brendan Ho vs Brock Ranney / Garrett Ranney6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesIan Kidd vs Christopher Tunnell3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristopher Lesher / Jimmy Jeffries vs Jason Self / Paul Self4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKeneth Conerly / Chito Lam vs Daniel Tzonev / John Dilyard0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · NEOTA A18&O 4.0 Men Summer
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1A18 4.0M 2 LT2 Simon10043719297
2A18 4.0M 3 PW Fleischer91361442408
3A18 4.0M 4 WE Elefter82371337388
4A18 4.0M 1 AS Smith73351539377
5A18 4.0M 3 MM1 Burnoski73302050418
6A18 4.0M 1 PM Sours64311946416
7A18 4.0M 3 MM2 Dorsch64272351434
8A18 4.0M 2 NC Paulino64242660465
9A18 4.0M 2 CC Benny55252554471
10A18 4.0M 4 WR DeLong46242660455
11A18 4.0M 4 CRC Repko46222864491
12A18 4.0M 1 LT1 Kidd46203067469
13A18 4.0M 4 MV Mock28153574505
14A18 4.0M 2 TP Leffler19113982555
15A18 4.0M 1 SP Steere19113984552
16A18 4.0M 3 MM3 Kumar01094186552

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Ian Kidd
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #1 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.81
Keshav Mody
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Adam Fye
published 4
3.70
Charles Kealy
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Brendan Ho
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.62
Christopher Lesher
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.56
Pranav Srinivasan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.55
Keneth Conerly
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.55
Vish Chandran
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Chito Lam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.45
Nat Weiner
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.41
Lee Sulzener
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Scott Bunge
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.21
SHENGYONG WANG
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.19
Ryan Garst
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chito Lam + Christopher Lesher6070% games+16.7% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Christopher Lesher7164% games+10.1% vs expected
Ian Kidd + Lee Sulzener6357% games+6.5% vs expected
Ryan Garst + Lee Sulzener4253% games−5.2% vs expected
Chito Lam + Lee Sulzener6358% gamesnot enough data
Brendan Ho + Lee Sulzener123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ian Kidd
24W–16L career · 11 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.90
Keshav Mody
5W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Adam Fye
27W–22L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Charles Kealy
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Brendan Ho
31W–43L career · 7 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.63
3.5
Christopher Lesher
46W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%17%83%
3.62
Pranav Srinivasan
0W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
Keneth Conerly
7W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
Vish Chandran
34W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Chito Lam
35W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
3.51
Nat Weiner
15W–11L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
3.45
Lee Sulzener
81W–52L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
3.41
Scott Bunge
10W–35L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.25
SHENGYONG WANG
28W–45L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Ryan Garst
129W–104L career · 6 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.