Teams

Kim - RPM

2026 Montgomery Combo Winter · Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men

15 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-03-25vs Zhang - Les BallersWon 21
W#1 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Jun Hee Kim vs James Lincoln / Frank Wang6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKurubel Asgedom / Woo Jin Shim vs Shubo Zhang / Qi Zhao3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSithisak Sutsakhan / Louis Fung vs Wei Huang / Jay Colella6-3, 6-4
2026-03-16vs ChenLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Jun Hee Kim vs Bo Gao / Justin Tung6-3, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLouis Fung / Isaac Lai vs Yipeng Chen / Hanlun Song1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMark Tyler / Woo Jin Shim vs Ce Charles Li / Chungfu Yang1-6, 3-6
2026-03-09vs Wolf - Sultans of SwingWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Michael Zehr / Chris Odell6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Kameron Hnath vs Joshua Folk / David Warren6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKurubel Asgedom / Louis Fung vs Alex Podpaly / Dmitri Blumin4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-03-01vs Soh - Game ChangersLost 03
L#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Danny Thai vs Johnson Yoo / Jung Kim4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPing-Jung Liu / Isaac Lai vs Jeeho Lee / Robert Kim2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKameron Hnath / Woo Jin Shim vs David Kim / Jaeseong Lee2-6, 4-6
2026-02-23vs Munshell - IHT 7.5 ComboWon 21
L#1 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Leonid Leznik / Daniel Mansfield2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Bent / Jeremy Bloom vs Larry Wall / Tim Munshell6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPeter Zhu / Kurubel Asgedom vs Matt Baumann / Kyle Spinks6-1, 6-4
2026-02-16vs Hamdani - Ace KissersWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Jeremy Bloom vs Justin Metz / Terry Tate6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Jun Hee Kim vs Keitaro Nishimura / Jon Anders6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDanny Thai / Woo Jin Shim vs Tyrone D'angelis / Myles Baldwin0-6, 2-6
2026-02-06vs McKeon - DefendersLost 03
L#1 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Isaac Lai vs Alexandre Fines / James Forbes1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesPeter Zhu / Kurubel Asgedom vs Scott Miller / Jeffrey Santos3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBo Liang / Kameron Hnath vs Jim Leveque / Dominik Cieslak4-6, 0-6
2026-01-21vs ChenWon 30
W#1 DoublesMatthew Bent / Jeremy Bloom vs Bo Gao / Jie Wang6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Jun Hee Kim vs Yipeng Chen / David Tong6-2, 7-6
W#3 DoublesLouis Fung / Peter Zhu vs Junyi Shi / Xiao Liu6-0, 6-4
2026-01-14vs Wolf - Sultans of SwingLost 03
L#1 DoublesHyunjae Jeon / Isaac Lai vs Simon Linder / Chris Odell2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesDanny Thai / Sithisak Sutsakhan vs Bradley Jacques / Dileep Nair0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesWoo Jin Shim / Kameron Hnath vs Wei-Chang Yang / James Wen3-6, 1-6
2026-01-05vs Soh - Game ChangersLost 12
W#1 DoublesJun Hee Kim / Matthew Bent vs Johnson Yoo / Jaeil Ahn6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesDanny Thai / Ping-Jung Liu vs Martin Koo / Jin-Gu Lee3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLouis Fung / Mark Tyler vs Yong Ryu / Jin Soh4-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Combo Winter 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Hyunjae Jeon
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.73
Matthew Bent
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 4
3.53
Peter Zhu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.50
Louis Fung
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.49
Jeremy Bloom
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Jun Hee Kim
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.28
Danny Thai
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Kameron Hnath
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.17
Sithisak Sutsakhan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Isaac Lai
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.15
Mark Tyler
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.10
Kurubel Asgedom
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published 3
2.94
Woo Jin Shim
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.87
Bo Liang
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Ping-Jung Liu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hyunjae Jeon + Jun Hee Kim4161% games+11.4% vs expected
Matthew Bent + Jeremy Bloom3251% games−2.9% vs expected
Danny Thai + Kameron Hnath134 matchesnot enough data
Louis Fung + Mark Tyler213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Hyunjae Jeon
58W–45L career · 7 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Matthew Bent
58W–23L career · 7 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Peter Zhu
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.53
Louis Fung
21W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
Jeremy Bloom
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
Jun Hee Kim
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Danny Thai
6W–12L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
Kameron Hnath
9W–17L career · 7 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sithisak Sutsakhan
103W–109L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Isaac Lai
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
Mark Tyler
26W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Kurubel Asgedom
34W–49L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%23%77%
3.10
Woo Jin Shim
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.94
3
Bo Liang
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
2.87
Ping-Jung Liu
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.