Teams

Keck 40+/Knoxville

2025 Tri-Level 40 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-02-08vs Snyder40/KnoxvilleWon 20
W#1 DoublesDavid Harano / Curtis DeFord vs Bryce Curry / Norman Lea6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEdmon Begoli / Jeff Pewitt vs Jacob Gonzalez / Jesse Lunsford6-0, 6-2
2025-02-01vs Snyder40/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Harano / Rob Lucas vs Norman Lea / Asad Malik6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCurtis DeFord / Rob Bray vs Wade Shrivalle / Hunter Arritt6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJeff Pewitt / Thomas Flores vs Jesse Lunsford / Jacob Gonzalez6-2, 6-0
2025-01-25vs Snyder40/KnoxvilleWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Harano / Rob Lucas vs Norman Lea / Asad Malik5-3
W#2 DoublesKevin Keck / Curtis DeFord vs Hunter Arritt / Stephen Smith6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Shirley / Edmon Begoli vs Jacob Gonzalez / Burke Arthur6-1, 6-1
2025-01-18vs Snyder40/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesRob Lucas / Curtis DeFord vs Norman Lea / Bryce Curry3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRob Bray / Stephen Wills vs Hunter Arritt / Stephen Smith1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesThomas Flores / Thomas Shirley vs Jesse Lunsford / Scott Krummen6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
David Harano
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.55
Kevin Keck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Stephen Wills
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Rob Lucas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.31
Edmon Begoli
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Rob Bray
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.27
Curtis DeFord
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Thomas Shirley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jeff Pewitt
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Thomas Flores
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephen Wills + Rob Bray13560% games+6.8% vs expected
Jeff Pewitt + Thomas Flores5362% gamesnot enough data
David Harano + Rob Lucas224 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Keck + Rob Lucas213 matchesnot enough data
Edmon Begoli + Jeff Pewitt303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Harano
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.64
Kevin Keck
37W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%35%65%
3.55
Stephen Wills
24W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Rob Lucas
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
3.42
Edmon Begoli
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
Rob Bray
21W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Curtis DeFord
18W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Thomas Shirley
17W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Jeff Pewitt
15W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Thomas Flores
11W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.