Teams

JOHNSON RANCH 18AW3.5C

2023 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.56 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.66
Jennifer Ryder
published
3.63
Jane van Loon
published
3.54
Caryn Wong
published 3.5
3.49
Barbara Sanchez
published 3.5
3.38
Natalie Chang
published
3.34
Caroline Duong-Tran
published 3.5
3.26
Rhona Wu
published
Catherine Webster
published 3.5
Cathy SooHoo
published 3.5
3.24
Lauren Pugh
published
3.24
Linda Sandretti
published
3.22
Dahlia Zuidema
published 3.5
3.21
Colleen Buck
published 3.5
3.17
Lori Grbac
published
3.17
Janelle Schultz
published
3.08
Julie Willardsen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caryn Wong + Colleen Buck7063% games+14.4% vs expected
Jane van Loon + Natalie Chang8163% games+4.2% vs expected
Lori Grbac + Dahlia Zuidema123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audriana Ketchersid
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Ryder
21W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%11%89%
3.66
Jane van Loon
25W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Caryn Wong
21W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Barbara Sanchez
11W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%53%47%
3.49
Natalie Chang
14W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Caroline Duong-Tran
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.34
Rhona Wu
13W–16L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Webster
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Cathy SooHoo
no matches on record · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lauren Pugh
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
Linda Sandretti
15W–9L career · no lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Dahlia Zuidema
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Colleen Buck
19W–14L career · no lines in 2023
5%93%1%
3.21
Lori Grbac
2W–13L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Janelle Schultz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Julie Willardsen
3W–9L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.08

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.