Teams

Be.Farrell40C

2024 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 2.83 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-09-25vs Ki.Manning40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Kelly Thompson vs Carol Fielitz / Stephanie Fogarty6-7, 4-6
2024-09-11vs Je.Sagal Solomon40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Kristin Upchurch vs Christina Scagnelli / Corinne Alavi6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-09-04vs Pa.Spell40CLost 02
L#1 DoublesKathryn Nani / Connie Dimitroff vs Donna Driscoll / Carol Abercrombie6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Jana Inman vs Dane Brackett / Cathy Lanter2-6, 2-6
2024-08-28vs Br.Robinson40CLost 01
L#2 DoublesLaurie Holderness / Lauren Hampton vs Wendy Roberts / Donna Hovis2-6, 4-6
2024-08-14vs La.McRee40CLost 01
L#1 DoublesKathryn Nani / Susan Potter vs Sabrina Kane / AMY KOCH1-6, 3-6
2024-08-12vs Ki.Lamb40CLost 01
L#3 DoublesKathryn Nani / Lauren Hampton vs Jeannette Walker / Dee Ann Cooper6-4, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.51 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Stephanie Bradley
published
2.84
Beth Farrell
published 3
2.74
Monica Gardner
published
2.73
Kristin Upchurch
published
2.62
Laurie Holderness
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.59
Kathryn Nani
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.41
Lauren Hampton
published
2.10
Connie Dimitroff
published 2.5
2.08
Diane Bosnjak King
published 2.5
2.04
Jana Inman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Nani + Laurie Holderness213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Bradley
13W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
2.97
3
Beth Farrell
14W–14L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
2.84
3
Courtney Kaprelian
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica Gardner
11W–8L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
2.74
Kristin Upchurch
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Laurie Holderness
79W–109L career · 4 lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
Kathryn Nani
55W–93L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Lauren Hampton
10W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%76%24%
2.41
2.5
Connie Dimitroff
2W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.10
2.5
Diane Bosnjak King
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.08
Jana Inman
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.04

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.