Teams

Cobern/JB/3Oaks

2024 Singles 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-12-11vs Gifford/JB/JCCLost 01
L#1 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Mallory Hurst1-6, 1-6
2024-12-04vs Noto/JB/JCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMorgan Lovelace vs Samantha McFadden3-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesCaroline Wilson vs Hannah Malone6-1, 6-1
2024-11-26vs Gifford/JB/JCCSplit 11
W#1 SinglesKamri Herndon vs Alley Bell6-4, 6-2
L#2 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Kirby Smith1-6, 0-6
2024-11-20vs Parker/JB/APSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Jennifer Fancher2-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesKamri Herndon vs Brandee Kyle6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-11-14vs Chambers/JB/APCCWon 21
W#1 SinglesKamri Herndon vs Jami Sharp6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesErica Snider vs Alyssa Ishmael6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMorgan Lovelace vs Hannah Chambers6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-11-11vs Daniel/JB/3OaksWon 10
W#1 SinglesKamri Herndon vs Sarah Newbern6-3, 6-0
2024-11-07vs Daniel/JB/3OaksLost 01
L#3 SinglesCaroline Wilson vs Morgan Davis-Daniel1-6, 0-6
2024-11-04vs Parker/JB/APLost 02
L#2 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Paige Parnell0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesCaroline Wilson vs Brandee Kyle1-6, 1-6
2024-10-29vs Wade-Wildy/JB/APLost 12
W#1 SinglesJanelle Hocutt vs Tamila Hoy6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMorgan Lovelace vs Melanie Burnett1-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesKristen Scarlett vs Jeanne Bailey5-7, 2-6
2024-10-17vs Chambers/JB/APCCWon 30
W#1 SinglesErica Snider vs Audra McClung6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Alyssa Ishmael6-1, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKristen Scarlett vs Jami Sharp6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.84
Janelle Hocutt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.82
Kamri Herndon
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Erica Snider
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.47
Renee Cobern
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.29
Caroline Wilson
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.21
Morgan Lovelace
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.07
Kristen Scarlett
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Wilson + Renee Cobern224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janelle Hocutt
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
Kamri Herndon
15W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Erica Snider
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Renee Cobern
22W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%60%40%
2.47
2.5
Caroline Wilson
16W–29L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
Morgan Lovelace
19W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.21
Kristen Scarlett
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.