Teams

MAC 3.0 18+ Men's Team:Hlavaty/Mills

2026 EMA Adult 18 & Over Men · 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-15vs FERN:Ferncroft:CourtemancheSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Hans Ernst vs Stephen Gillis / Anubhav Bhargava1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Thomas Pilleri6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRichard Gates / Marcel Leyton vs Steve Aghiarian / Zeljko Radulovic0-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesHenrik Ernst vs George Scangas6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Peter Germond6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRob Cox / Marcel Leyton vs Michael Kent / Rich Alimenti2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesRichard Gates vs CHRIS CHANG3-6, 2-6
2026-06-29vs SFTNA:Spark-NA:Team CoffeyLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Hans Ernst vs Jason Carignan / Hans Fajardo1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Jeff Long6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesFrancis Hawks / Keith Faulkner vs Carlton SooHoo / Mark Baron2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesRichard Gates vs Mario Merino-Flores3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesRob Cox / David Malouf vs Jeffrey Cary / Steve DeSimone1-6, 0-6
2026-06-15vs BRTC:Volley llamas:SuchoparLost 23
L#1 DoublesFrancis Hawks / Keith Faulkner vs Nathan Hudson / Reid Krugman1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Pritesh Sharma6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHans Ernst / Henrik Ernst vs Andre Ebersole / Jim Steggall6-1, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 SinglesRichard Gates vs Ben Suchopar6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Parker / Marcel Leyton vs Jay Bothwick / Adam Carullo6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Hans Ernst vs Scott Bergquist / Alec MacMaster2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Peter Germond6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKeith Faulkner / Francis Hawks vs Rich Alimenti / CHRIS CHANG6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRichard Gates vs Vidya Guruju2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMarcel Leyton / Rob Cox vs Chuck Anderson / Owen Nichols0-6, 0-6
2026-05-18vs FERN:Ferncroft:CourtemancheLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Francis Hawks vs Anubhav Bhargava / Sanjay Aurora2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Stephen Gillis4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMarcel Leyton / Rob Cox vs Dan Tucci / Zeljko Radulovic1-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesHans Ernst vs George Scangas7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesDaniel Mitnik / David Umstead vs Khiem Le / Kenneth Tarr2-6, 0-6
2026-05-14vs BRTC:Volley llamas:SuchoparLost 14
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Francis Hawks vs Mark Fazio / Michael Walsh5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBrendan Chauret vs Ben Suchopar6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRob Cox / Hans Ernst vs Adam Carullo / Jesse Vuona6-7, 6-5, 0-1
L#2 SinglesRichard Gates vs Andre Ebersole2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMarcel Leyton / David Umstead vs Reid Krugman / Jay Bothwick0-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SFTNA:Spark-NA:Team Coffey07251025245
2SFT-A:Spark Red:Sideman07241130286
3SFT-A:Spark Blue Sideman0782754370
4MAC 3.0 18+ Men's Team:Hlavaty/Mills0792654368
5IPCC: Ipswich CC:Liptak/Daley08251534300
6FERN:Ferncroft:Courtemanche08221845366
7BRTC:Volley llamas:Suchopar08162455409
8IRCC:Indian Ridge:Edelmann0893165432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.66 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Brendan Chauret
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Daniel Mitnik
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Malouf
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
David Umstead
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.70
Francis Hawks
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Hans Ernst
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.69
Keith Faulkner
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Richard Gates
usually #2 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
2.47
Marcel Leyton
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.42
Rob Cox
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Henrik Ernst
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Marie Wick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Richard Gates + Rob Cox033 matchesnot enough data
Rob Cox + Marcel Leyton033 matchesnot enough data
Keith Faulkner + Francis Hawks033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Brendan Chauret
5W–2L career · type S · 7 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Daniel Mitnik
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
David Malouf
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
David Umstead
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Francis Hawks
0W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
Hans Ernst
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
2.69
Keith Faulkner
1W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Richard Gates
3W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
2.61
Marcel Leyton
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Rob Cox
1W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.42
Henrik Ernst
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marie Wick
20W–17L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.