Teams

Mountain Christie Tucker

2025 MTA Southern Combo 40 & Over - Spring '25 · Women's 7.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-23vs Mountain Norma-Jean BaxterLost 12
W#1 DoublesSheila Wilson / Yan Key vs Gail Deluca / Dori Mitchen6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesPatty Tynes / Christie Tucker vs Norma-Jean Baxter / Melanie Powell3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesNancy Cantrell / Dee Campbell vs Carol Peterson / Patty Lee2-6, 4-6
2025-08-16vs Mountain Jo-Ann CrawfordWon 30
W#1 DoublesYan Key / Sheila Wilson vs Claudette Parker / Donna Symons6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria D'Alessandro / Patty Tynes vs Therese Welch / Lori Shiffman7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLauren McCormick / Nancy Cantrell vs Jackie Duncan / Jessica Carson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-08-02vs Mountain Jo-Ann CrawfordLost 03
L#1 DoublesDarra Schmidt / Cynthia Gray vs Donna Symons / Claudette Parker2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNancy Cantrell / Maria D'Alessandro vs Deena Wilson / Nicole Williams0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDee Campbell / Christie Tucker vs Sue Lowe-watters / Shawn Beyer6-7, 3-6
2025-07-26vs Mountain Norma-Jean BaxterLost 03
L#1 DoublesChristie Tucker / Courtenay Emacio vs Gail Deluca / Holly Cannon7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSheila Wilson / Jacqueline Medeiros vs Karen Matthews / Jacqueline Hughes3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesYan Key / Deborah Kelley vs Norma-Jean Baxter / Patty Lee1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-07-12vs Mountain Jo-Ann CrawfordWon 30
W#1 DoublesAllyson Brantley / Courtenay Emacio vs Heather Luzier / Sharon Petrey6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMaria D'Alessandro / Cynthia Gray vs Sarah Venable / Jana Andringa6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesChristie Tucker / Yan Key vs Diana Mahaney / Gail Fargason6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women's 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Courtenay Emacio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.46
Yan Key
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Deborah Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Darra Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Christie Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.08
Maria D'Alessandro
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Jacqueline Medeiros
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Dee Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Patty Tynes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Allyson Brantley
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.85
Nancy Cantrell
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Sheila Wilson
published
Stacy Crawford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Tynes + Christie Tucker3259% gamesnot enough data
Nancy Cantrell + Yan Key213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Courtenay Emacio
6W–3L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Yan Key
20W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Deborah Kelley
2W–6L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darra Schmidt
22W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Christie Tucker
21W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
Maria D'Alessandro
8W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Jacqueline Medeiros
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
3.5
Dee Campbell
43W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
3.06
Patty Tynes
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
3.01
3.5
Allyson Brantley
6W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.90
Nancy Cantrell
6W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.85
Sheila Wilson
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stacy Crawford
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.