Teams

5 Avalon Giacchi

2022 Richmond Adult 40 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-01vs 3 Burkwood MarcouxWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / John Bates vs Chris Marcoux / Nat Cross6-1, 6-2
2022-07-24vs 6 Raintree HeinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / John Bates vs Alex Burnett / Jack Lyons6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChris Giacchi / Nicholas Grainger vs Jared Gnazzo / Rahul Khisti6-1, 6-2
2022-07-10Won 10
W#1 DoublesChris Giacchi / Nicholas Grainger vs Darren Painter / Robert Adams3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-06-26vs 3 Burkwood MarcouxWon 10
W#1 DoublesSteven Edlavitch / Chris Giacchi vs Michael Jernigan / David Steffy6-1, 6-1
2022-06-23vs 4 Avalon Godri/GhitaWon 10
W#1 DoublesChris Giacchi / Nicholas Grainger vs Venkatachelam Regulagedda / John Carlton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-06-12vs 6 Raintree HeinsWon 10
W#1 SinglesSteven Edlavitch vs James Andrews6-7, 6-0, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 40 & Over 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Nicholas Grainger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.57
Chris Giacchi
published 3.5
3.49
Steven Edlavitch
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Kristopher Johnson
published
2.76
Ford Sleeman
published 3
2.72
Brian Hellenga
published 3
2.66
John Sentz
published
2.65
John Bates
published
2.62
Chris Haberlin
published 3
2.27
Eric Zimmerman
published 2.5
Sumit Kumar
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Steven Edlavitch + Nicholas Grainger10165% games+9.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Nicholas Grainger
109W–50L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%17%83%
3.62
3.5
Chris Giacchi
18W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Steven Edlavitch
122W–71L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
Kristopher Johnson
17W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.02
3
Ford Sleeman
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
3
Brian Hellenga
10W–19L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
2.72
John Sentz
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
2.66
John Bates
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
2.65
3
Chris Haberlin
8W–13L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.62
2.5
Eric Zimmerman
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%96%4%
2.27
Sumit Kumar
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.