Teams

BHoff/LWallace (Carmel)

2025 Combo Doubles 55 & Over League · 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-08vs SMyers (Park Road)Won 10
W#2 DoublesJanat Schramm / Paige Reece vs Susan Grills / LuAnn Tomlin6-0, 6-3
2025-10-06vs JZangmeister/Collins (WSRC)Won 10
W#1 DoublesBethany Hoff / Kathryn Wholey vs Jan Puckett / Celia Stallings3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-09-22vs SDickson (WSRC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Langdon / Mary Ruth Faulkner vs Jacqui Gentile / Catherine Rousseaux3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesBethany Hoff / Sharon Dotson vs Lisa Duggins / Julia Murphy6-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesMary Ruth Faulkner / Janat Schramm vs Kay Porter / Laura Hendler6-1, 6-1
2025-09-08vs CLetorney (Piper Glen)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTammy Langdon / Kathryn Wholey vs Kathy Harborne / Bridget Megginson3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-18vs EKyle (FCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJanat Schramm / Mary Ruth Faulkner vs Anne Paramore / Deborah Todd6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-08-13vs JThaker (BCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesBethany Hoff / Mary Ruth Faulkner vs Julie Derrico / Melodie Ohaus2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 55 & Over 6.5 Women - Mon AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.15
Beth Herlocker
published 3.5
3.13
Heidi Friedman
published
3.12
Bethany Hoff
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Janat Schramm
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.96
Tammy Langdon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.95
Paige Reece
published
2.95
Barbara Diachenko
published 3.5
2.82
Kathryn Wholey
published
2.76
Mary Ruth Faulkner
published
Angie Michaud
published 3
2.68
Alison Ridenhour
published 3
Sharon Dotson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janat Schramm + Tammy Langdon3355% gamesnot enough data
Angie Michaud + Bethany Hoff123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Beth Herlocker
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
Heidi Friedman
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Bethany Hoff
21W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Janat Schramm
31W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3.5
Tammy Langdon
10W–25L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
Paige Reece
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
3.5
Barbara Diachenko
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.95
Kathryn Wholey
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.82
Mary Ruth Faulkner
0W–5L career · no lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.76
3
Angie Michaud
12W–36L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Alison Ridenhour
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
2.68
Sharon Dotson
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.