Teams

Malibu Waves

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over WEEKDAY - Ventura · Ventura - Women 3.5 WD

19 players · average NTRP 3.27 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-04vs Pierpont RacquettesLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Mand / Elizabeth Weaver vs Theresa Vasquez / Maureen Vasquez1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesFiona Corrigan / Rhonda Mosser vs Erin Kraus / MacKenzie Kraus3-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIlda Jacobsen / Yvonne Esquerra-Bard vs Shannon Oswald / Mariana Schindler1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Weaver / Erin Mand vs Courtney Miller-Jones / Rory Kennedy6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMyriam Marques / Marina Grasic vs Amanda Humphrey / Nora Cohen2-6, 0-6
2026-05-26vs Las Posas Sun SlammersLost 02
L#1 DoublesMyriam Marques / Marina Grasic vs Barbara Heitman / Jill Heybl3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBarbara Ferris / Yvonne Esquerra-Bard vs Carrie Kelleher / Yvette Hays0-6, 6-7
2026-05-21vs Mission Oaks Love HurtsWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Mand / Elizabeth Weaver vs Leslie Gache / Diane Hendrickson6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesIlda Jacobsen vs Tracy Leiterman2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMyriam Marques / Andrea Rader vs Lianne Noddle / Cathy Welch6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2026-05-14vs One LoveLost 03
L#1 DoublesMyriam Marques / Brenda Gillis vs Sherri Murphy / Brett Bennett0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Esquerra-Bard / Rhonda Mosser vs Angelina Snyder / Taryn Barnhill0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendy Nickerson / Jeanne Thompson vs Lynne F Krueger / Nancy Brightwell1-6, 1-6
2026-05-07vs Positively WAC Spring 2026Lost 13
L#1 DoublesPetra Klane / Brenda Gillis vs Patti Wilson / Rayya Cooke1-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMyriam Marques vs Kim Tavasoli6-3, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarina Grasic / Jeanne Thompson vs Renae Saliano / Mary Scotti5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesWendy Nickerson / Andrea Rader vs Lynda Balletta / Robyn Russak3-6, 3-6
2026-04-30vs Mission Oaks Parks & WreckSplit 22
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Weaver / Erin Mand vs Kristin Casanova / Denise Bolish6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesIlda Jacobsen vs Mignonne Nieva4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMyriam Marques / Marina Grasic vs Barbara Nelles / Judy Liu6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesRhonda Mosser / Andrea Rader vs Julie Kurowski / Kelly Decker2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2026-04-23vs NRCC Match PointSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLinda Albert / Elizabeth Weaver vs Danielle Crawford / Angela Reynolds3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesIlda Jacobsen vs Christine Lundberg1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYvonne Esquerra-Bard / Barbara Ferris vs Shannon Ellis / Michelle Rapoport0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMargery Teller / Brenda Gillis vs Meredith Romero / Melissa Mccoy4-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 3.5 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.08 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Linda Albert
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.37
Erin Mand
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Barbara Ferris
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Myriam Marques
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.22
Lilit Khatchaturian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
3.21
Elizabeth Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Marina Grasic
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.16
Andrea Rader
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Lina Harandi
published
3.04
Margery Teller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Brenda Gillis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Rhonda Mosser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Yvonne Esquerra-Bard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Wendy Crump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Ilda Jacobsen
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Fiona Corrigan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Wendy Nickerson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
Jeanne Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Petra Klane
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Crump + Wendy Nickerson7953% games+7.0% vs expected
Erin Mand + Elizabeth Weaver8648% games+0.1% vs expected
Margery Teller + Wendy Nickerson4151% gamesnot enough data
Myriam Marques + Marina Grasic123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Albert
91W–48L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Erin Mand
22W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Barbara Ferris
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Myriam Marques
3W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
3
Lilit Khatchaturian
74W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.22
3.5
Elizabeth Weaver
13W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.21
Marina Grasic
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Andrea Rader
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
Lina Harandi
3W–1L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Margery Teller
81W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
3.04
3.5
Brenda Gillis
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
3.00
Rhonda Mosser
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.98
Yvonne Esquerra-Bard
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
2.97
3
Wendy Crump
47W–63L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Ilda Jacobsen
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Fiona Corrigan
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Wendy Nickerson
43W–122L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
2.74
Jeanne Thompson
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Petra Klane
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.