Teams

PHX/SerameSmith/55&O/7.0M

2024 SPRING Adult 55 & Over - CAZ · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.58 / CENTRAL ARIZONA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-03-30vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SLost 03
L#1 DoublesPatrick Smith / David Mogensen vs Kenneth Stanczyk / Charles Meyer2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTom Serame / Robert Furman vs Rick Rasmussen / Bart Bergendahl3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKeith Kujawski / Steve Meihaus vs Scott Bean / Gary Huber5-7, 1-6
2024-03-23vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SLost 12
L#1 DoublesJohn Cooney / David Mogensen vs Bart Bergendahl / Rick Rasmussen4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Meihaus / Robert Furman vs Scott Bean / Gary Huber7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChuck Emmert / Keith Kujawski vs BURKE PLUMMER / Don Blair2-6, 1-6
2024-03-16vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Cooney / Gary Blandino vs Gary Huber / Bart Bergendahl6-1, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAl Haase / Tom Serame vs Kenneth Stanczyk / Charles Meyer6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Smith / David Mogensen vs Scott Bean / Don Blair4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-03-09vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Furman / Chuck Emmert vs Gary Huber / Bart Bergendahl4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesTom Serame / Grant Neiss vs Scott Bean / Rick Rasmussen4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPatrick Smith / David Mogensen vs Kenneth Stanczyk / Don Blair3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-03-02vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesJohn Cooney / Gary Blandino vs Scott Bean / Don Blair6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAl Haase / Tom Serame vs Gary Huber / Rick Rasmussen6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGregory Peterson / Steve Meihaus vs Charles Meyer / Kenneth Stanczyk7-5, 7-5
2024-02-10vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Blandino / John Cooney vs Scott Bean / Bart Bergendahl6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTom Hessler / Tom Serame vs Charles Meyer / BURKE PLUMMER2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Mogensen / Grant Neiss vs Gary Huber / Rick Rasmussen4-6, 2-6
2024-02-03vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SWon 21
W#1 DoublesGary Blandino / John Cooney vs Gary Huber / Rick Rasmussen6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGrant Neiss / David Mogensen vs BURKE PLUMMER / Don Blair4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGregory Peterson / Steve Meihaus vs Craig Pochardt / Scott Bean6-2, 6-1
2024-01-27vs 7.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55SWon 30
W#1 DoublesTom Serame / Tom Hessler vs Gary Huber / Rick Rasmussen4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJohn Cooney / Gary Blandino vs Kenneth Stanczyk / Charles Meyer2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Smith / David Mogensen vs Scott Bean / Craig Pochardt3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 Adult 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PHX/SerameSmith/55&O/7.0M5315925214
27.0 TPR HuberPochardt M55S3591531225

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Gregory Peterson
published 4
3.44
Tom Hessler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Gary Blandino
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Al Haase
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Grant Neiss
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Chuck Emmert
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.07
Steve Meihaus
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
David Mogensen
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.03
Tom Serame
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Keith Kujawski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Robert Furman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Mogensen + Grant Neiss9755% games+10.8% vs expected
Tom Serame + Tom Hessler16457% games+7.9% vs expected
David Mogensen + Tom Hessler16957% games+7.9% vs expected
Tom Serame + Al Haase11652% games+6.9% vs expected
David Mogensen + Al Haase3254% games+6.3% vs expected
Tom Serame + Grant Neiss3447% games−0.6% vs expected
Tom Serame + Gregory Peterson3340% games−5.1% vs expected
Tom Serame + David Mogensen2540% games−13.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Gregory Peterson
33W–26L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tom Hessler
147W–67L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
3.5
Gary Blandino
65W–61L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Al Haase
99W–133L career · 2 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Grant Neiss
37W–74L career · 3 lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Chuck Emmert
16W–59L career · 2 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Steve Meihaus
18W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.07
3.5
David Mogensen
144W–175L career · 7 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
3.04
Tom Serame
121W–181L career · 6 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
3.03
Keith Kujawski
15W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Furman
16W–39L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.