Teams

Fieldstone (Jennie Laliberte)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Weekday Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel)

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2024-06-20Lost 01
L#3 DoublesKatie Reed / Ana Ortiz vs Elisia van Scoter / Rachel Willis4-6, 4-6
2024-05-16Lost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Boyd / Ana Ortiz vs ANNA BEAN / Lindsey Hitt6-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Sonya Peel) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Lynn Wilhelm
published
Amy Meyer
published 4
3.54
Tracy Saracki
published
3.49
Becky Flora
published 3.5
3.32
Fabiola Rodriguez
published
3.30
Ana Ortiz
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amelia Gillis
published 3.5
Carol Ziemba
published 3.5
3.23
Maxine Young
published
Jennie Laliberte
published
Lisa Peacock
published
Magdalena Zielinska
published
Michelle Hicks
published
Michelle Holliman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Meyer + Lynn Wilhelm41464% games+6.9% vs expected
Lisa Peacock + Michelle Holliman1544% games−7.9% vs expected
Lisa Peacock + Fabiola Rodriguez4164% gamesnot enough data
Lynn Wilhelm + Tracy Saracki4155% gamesnot enough data
Maxine Young + Tracy Saracki404 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Holliman + Fabiola Rodriguez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Wilhelm
78W–21L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Amy Meyer
58W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracy Saracki
44W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%38%62%
3.54
3.5
Becky Flora
20W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Fabiola Rodriguez
40W–18L career · no lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
3.32
3.5
Ana Ortiz
16W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
3.5
Amelia Gillis
9W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Carol Ziemba
16W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Maxine Young
52W–32L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Jennie Laliberte
31W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Peacock
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Magdalena Zielinska
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Hicks
36W–19L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Michelle Holliman
11W–10L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.