Teams

*3-SFu-Eno

2024 Eno River Adult 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd

11 players · average NTRP 3.62 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-04-26vs *4-CMoffitt-EnoLost 01
L#1 DoublesManuel Mariategui Vargas / Stephen Fu vs Barry Gooch / Mark Petersen0-6, 2-6
2024-04-25vs *8-ELanghans -EnoLost 02
L#1 DoublesVaibhav Parmar / Deraymes Harris vs Saad Masood / Jacob McLennan2-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesXINGZHOU LI / Stephen Fu vs Valentin Verdier / Edmund Fernandez4-6, 3-6
2024-04-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesMatthew Ross / Deraymes Harris vs Daniel Moore / James Schap7-5, 6-3
2024-03-12vs *2-JByrd-EnoLost 02
L#2 DoublesDeraymes Harris / Matthew Ross vs Eduardo Schlotterhausen / Stephen Holmes4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesStephen Fu / Daniel Wang vs Alex Piasecki / Jeff Friday3-6, 1-6
2024-02-22vs *6-MLong-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Ross / Deraymes Harris vs Robert Long / Andres Pineda6-2, 6-2
2024-02-15vs *7-DRobinson-EnoWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeraymes Harris / Matthew Ross vs Richard Griffin / Richard Millard6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.5 Men Wknd have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Jermaine Byrd
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.88
3.61
Matthew Curry
published
3.57
Deraymes Harris
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.20
Jeff Dooley
published
3.04
Stephen Fu
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.71
Martin Cho
published
Matthew Ross
published
Vaibhav Parmar
published
XINGZHOU LI
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Jermaine Byrd
135W–127L career · 5 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
4.04
Manuel Mariategui Vargas
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.88
Matthew Curry
29W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.61
3.5
Deraymes Harris
108W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%30%70%
3.57
Jeff Dooley
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Stephen Fu
75W–129L career · 4 lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Brandon van Buren
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
2.71
Martin Cho
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Ross
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Vaibhav Parmar
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
XINGZHOU LI
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.