Teams

CP-Markman

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Daniel Warren
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.98
Eric Baird
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results7 ties
2021-04-25Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGamage Viriththamulla / Daniel Warren vs Tim Smith / Mike Bursiek5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2021-04-17Won 10
W#2 DoublesDaniel Warren / Joseph Allison vs Tad Larsen / Justin Marquart4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2021-04-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesEric Baird / Jeff Trager vs Mark Eshom / Thomas Stave6-3, 0-6, 1-0
2021-04-03Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRobert Bengford / Daniel Warren vs Septimiu Morea / Petru Cociorva6-2, 6-3
2021-03-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesSavas Parastatidis / Eric Baird vs Brad Struss / Mark Martin6-1, 6-2
2021-03-14Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Bengford / Daniel Warren vs Andrew Allison / Mohammad Malakoutian7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2021-03-07Lost 01
L#3 DoublesDaniel Warren / Mike McKay vs Joel Higgins / David Phillips6-2, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Daniel Warren
79W–79L career
0%61%39%
3.08
3
Eric Baird
72W–53L career · type A
0%85%15%
2.98

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.