Teams

LCTA40/Holtz/Ion

2022 STA 40 & Over Combo Doubles · 40 & Over Combo Men - 8.5

17 players · average NTRP 4.28 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40 & Over Combo Men - 8.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.99 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.50
Dave Welch
published 5
4.41
Erik Loesch
published 4.5
Andrew Haefner
published 4.5
4.23
Robert Holtz
published
4.18
John Bumgarner
published
4.10
James Obrien
published 4
4.03
Jayson Wingfield
published
4.01
Eric Blackstone
published 4.5
3.90
Jason Daigle
published
Bryan Koerber
published 4
Frank Cuoco
published 4
3.70
Charles Claus
published 4
3.67
Costa Chakeris
published 4
3.62
Jay Meyer
published
3.50
Leonard Douglas
published
Steve Speer
published
Todd Hall
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Welch + James Obrien6072% games+14.3% vs expected
Erik Loesch + Charles Claus5257% games+1.4% vs expected
Leonard Douglas + Bryan Koerber4356% gamesnot enough data
John Bumgarner + Erik Loesch3252% gamesnot enough data
Charles Claus + Costa Chakeris2343% gamesnot enough data
Erik Loesch + Eric Blackstone404 matchesnot enough data
Erik Loesch + Andrew Haefner134 matchesnot enough data
Jason Daigle + Robert Holtz134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Dave Welch
35W–22L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
4.50
4.5
Erik Loesch
74W–32L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Andrew Haefner
12W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Robert Holtz
15W–19L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
John Bumgarner
27W–18L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4
James Obrien
71W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%22%78%
4.10
Jayson Wingfield
13W–17L career · no lines in 2022
41%59%<1%
4.03
4.5
Eric Blackstone
18W–19L career · no lines in 2022
48%52%<1%
4.01
Jason Daigle
92W–75L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Bryan Koerber
32W–23L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Frank Cuoco
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Charles Claus
36W–19L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Costa Chakeris
21W–18L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
Jay Meyer
48W–32L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
Leonard Douglas
32W–48L career · no lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
3.50
Steve Speer
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Todd Hall
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.