Teams

3 Hermitage Lines

2022 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-11-19vs 4 MAC GoldWon 10
W#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs John Benedict / Debra Moore6-1, 6-1
2022-10-29vs 11 WOCC KramerLost 01
L#1 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Jenny Norfleet / Bryan Norfleet4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-15vs 7 ACAC Preusser/HammittWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / David Blankley vs Tara Hudson / David Robinson6-2, 6-4
2022-10-08vs 5 Avalon SpruillWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / Douglas Lines vs Anne Spruill / Joseph Piwowarski6-3, 6-1
2022-09-10vs 12 Lakeside NaborsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAMY LINES / John Fitzgerald vs Christina Saunders / Jason Gartner6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Mixed 5.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
AMY LINES
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.63
Kathleen Crotty
published
3.33
Turner Broughton
published
3.29
Andrea Broughton
published 3.5
3.15
Lauren Hutcheson
published
3.04
Kimberly Ross
published
2.87
David Blankley
published 3
2.61
Alison Chesson
published 3
2.57
Samuel Adams
published
2.54
Douglas Lines
published 3
2.47
Wendy Stone
published
Jospeh Ross
published
Ralph Whitt
published
Rob Chesson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Broughton + Turner Broughton6356% games+11.1% vs expected
AMY LINES + Douglas Lines3450% games+2.9% vs expected
Kathleen Crotty + David Blankley4156% gamesnot enough data
Kimberly Ross + Jospeh Ross123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
AMY LINES
220W–87L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
Kathleen Crotty
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Turner Broughton
27W–13L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Andrea Broughton
23W–15L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Lauren Hutcheson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.15
Kimberly Ross
11W–5L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.04
3
David Blankley
20W–26L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
2.87
3
Alison Chesson
12W–22L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
2.61
Samuel Adams
10W–11L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Douglas Lines
14W–24L career · type A · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54
Wendy Stone
2W–17L career · no lines in 2022
60%40%<1%
2.47
Jospeh Ross
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ralph Whitt
3W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rob Chesson
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.