Teams

Smith - Sets In The City

2025 Montgomery Singles · Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-08-20Won 10
W#3 SinglesKaren Cheeks vs Sharon Gillooly6-0, 6-3
2025-08-16vs Kau - Honey Deuce 3.0 SinglesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Cheeks vs Xuan Du0-6, 3-6
2025-08-12vs Nelson - Smash ForceLost 03
L#1 SinglesErin Nguyen vs Beth Gregory2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesMugdha Samant vs Gail Ribas2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 SinglesAlina Sharafutdinova vs Mia Dentoni3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-07-24vs Cornelius - All The Singles LadiesLost 01
L#1 SinglesKaren Cheeks vs Margaret Cornelius1-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Singles 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Karen Cheeks
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.88
Alina Sharafutdinova
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.85
Alison Smith
published 3
2.71
Justine Handelman
published
2.64
Erin Nguyen
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.61
Mugdha Samant
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Lemin Xiao
published
2.12
Wendy Wasserman
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Karen Cheeks
66W–48L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
2.91
3
Alina Sharafutdinova
17W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Alison Smith
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
2.85
Justine Handelman
14W–15L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Erin Nguyen
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
2.64
Mugdha Samant
4W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
Lemin Xiao
16W–28L career · no lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
2.52
Wendy Wasserman
6W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.