Teams

Young/Chattanooga

2024 Combo 40 & Over-Chattanooga · 7.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-12vs Skinner/ChattanoogaWon 30
W#1 DoublesSandra Sadler / Alice Wyatt vs Camille Burkley-Wilson / LINDA van der MERWE6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBeverly Geismar / Tara Biondolillo vs Criss Skinner / Laura Mooney6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEmily Donohue Speer / Carol Tigar vs Elizabeth Smith / Regina Hickl-Szabo6-1, 6-2
2024-10-06vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesSusan Crum / Sandra Sadler vs Julie Briggs / Amy Weathers6-1, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Donohue Speer / Emily Bagley vs Laura Ketcham / Betsy Wilson7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLucynda Cynda Holmes / Charmaine Kincaid vs McKellar Newsom / Terina Fowler0-6, 1-6
2024-10-05vs Skinner/ChattanoogaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBeverly Geismar / Emily Bagley vs Laura Mooney / Criss Skinner4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesEmily Donohue Speer / Sandra Sadler vs Regina Hickl-Szabo / Carrie Kleban4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-10-05vs Ketcham/ChattanoogaLost 03
L#1 DoublesCarol Tigar / Tara Biondolillo vs Joni Wolfe / Amy Weathers6-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesAlice Wyatt / Emily Bagley vs Kennisha Cann / Betsy Wilson0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAnnie Adams / Charmaine Kincaid vs Laura Ketcham / Jennifer Hammargren6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alice Wyatt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Emily Donohue Speer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.58
Beverly Geismar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.54
Annie Adams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.50
Carol Tigar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.37
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.36
Emily Bagley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Tara Biondolillo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.24
Anthea Young
published 3.5
3.19
Charmaine Kincaid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Sandra Sadler
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alice Wyatt
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Emily Donohue Speer
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Beverly Geismar
27W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.58
4
Annie Adams
6W–16L career · type S · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Carol Tigar
58W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%50%50%
3.50
Lucynda Cynda Holmes
35W–36L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
3.37
3.5
Emily Bagley
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%86%13%
3.36
Tara Biondolillo
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2024
88%12%<1%
3.35
3.5
Anthea Young
10W–11L career · type A · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Charmaine Kincaid
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%92%1%
3.19
Sandra Sadler
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.