Teams

Balls Out 55

2025 USTA ADULT 55 and OVER - BOISE · TV

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-09vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesSaul Chessin / Stephen Sowinski vs David Carter / Matt Peck3-6, 1-6
2025-07-07vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesGreg Thompson / Patrick Brown vs Mike Kirby / Robb Warwick6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSaul Chessin / Stephen Sowinski vs Gary Sackett / Bob Lopez1-6, 3-6
2025-06-30vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 03
L#1 DoublesKen Azbill / Saul Chessin vs Kelly Bokn / David Carter4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Thompson / Jeffrey Wood vs Mike Kirby / Matt Suderman6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJay Larsen / Stephen Sowinski vs Robb Warwick / Gary Sackett2-6, 1-6
2025-06-25vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 01
L#2 DoublesKen Azbill / Stephen Sowinski vs David Carter / Michael Megale0-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesSaul Chessin / Ken Azbill vs Mike Kirby / Matt Suderman4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPatrick Brown / Stephen Sowinski vs Gary Sackett / Bob Lopez2-6, 1-6
2025-06-11vs Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0MLost 02
L#1 DoublesEric Davis / Stephen Sowinski vs Andy Carswell / Michael Megale0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKen Azbill / Saul Chessin vs Bob Lopez / Chris Walser2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · TV
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Idaho/Bokn/55&Over9.0M60180152
2Balls Out 550601836216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.60
Jay Larsen
published 4
3.54
Jason Jones
published 4
3.39
Jeffrey Wood
published 4
Greg Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Ken Azbill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Patrick Brown
published 0
Saul Chessin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Stephen Sowinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Jones + Jeffrey Wood10749% games+2.4% vs expected
Jeffrey Wood + Jay Larsen7451% games+0.6% vs expected
Jason Jones + Jay Larsen0539% gamesnot enough data
Ken Azbill + Saul Chessin033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jay Larsen
35W–79L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
3.60
4
Jason Jones
54W–64L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Jeffrey Wood
99W–84L career · type A · no lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
3.39
Greg Thompson
5W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Ken Azbill
6W–23L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
0
Patrick Brown
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Saul Chessin
1W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephen Sowinski
0W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.