Teams

Parkland/Cadena

2026 Broward TriLevel · 5.0

10 players · average NTRP 4.43 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-09-09vs Midtown/TorrellasWon 10
W#2 DoublesSegundo Decotto / Bruce Kurtz vs GUILLERMO TORRELLAS / Roberto Ribas6-2, 6-2
2026-08-27vs Midtown/TorrellasWon 20
W#1 DoublesJorge Cervantes / Anru Fourie vs Kenny Torrellas / Juan Ribas6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Segundo Decotto vs Pipo Torrellas / Roberto Ribas6-0, 6-4
2026-07-30vs Midtown/TorrellasWon 21
W#1 DoublesJorge Cervantes / Ryan Devine vs Juan Ribas / Rolando Torrellas6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSegundo Decotto / Bruce Kurtz vs GUILLERMO TORRELLAS / Chase Grainger6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLuis Novella / Santiago Restrepo vs Simon Palacios / Todd Schwartz6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2026-07-23vs Woodmont/L.MorenoLost 12
L#1 DoublesRyan Devine / Jorge Cervantes vs Micheal Plutt / Jonathan Deautriell5-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAlejandro Cadena / Arturo Carrasco vs Luis Moreno / Luis Soto5-7, 6-7
W#3 DoublesLuis Novella / Santiago Restrepo vs Sebastian Jimenez / Robert Gregory6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 5.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Woodmont/L.Moreno3072568
2Parkland/Cadena1133760
3Midtown/Torrellas032716102

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Anru Fourie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.39
Bruce Kurtz
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.34
Segundo Decotto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.30
Alejandro Cadena
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.29
Jack Komar
published 4.5
4.21
Arturo Carrasco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.96
Santiago Restrepo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.85
Luis Novella
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.81
Giovanni Guido
published 4
Ryan Devine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Segundo Decotto + Bruce Kurtz7457% games+4.6% vs expected
Santiago Restrepo + Giovanni Guido7064% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Cadena + Arturo Carrasco213 matchesnot enough data
Alejandro Cadena + Segundo Decotto213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anru Fourie
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
4.5
Bruce Kurtz
84W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
Segundo Decotto
13W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%88%11%
4.34
4.5
Alejandro Cadena
110W–54L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Jack Komar
11W–20L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.29
4.5
Arturo Carrasco
6W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
6%93%1%
4.21
Santiago Restrepo
36W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
3.96
4
Luis Novella
50W–22L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%87%13%
3.85
4
Giovanni Guido
12W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2026
1%92%7%
3.81
Ryan Devine
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.