Teams

Escambia/Tan/6.5/Women

2022 Escambia Combo 18 & Over · 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-12-15vs Gregory - PCCWon 10
W#2 DoublesTori Baker / Amelia Gandy vs Tammie Coco / Libby Covington6-1, 6-2
2022-12-08vs Fell - SHLWon 30
W#1 DoublesCherie Krohn / Dodi Stringfellow vs Denny Rarrick / Denise Wilson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesCherie Tan / Shannon Schluter vs Courtney Fell / Jessica Gonterman6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesTori Baker / Amelia Gandy vs Tina Corbin / Lowell-Ann Ryschon6-1, 6-2
2022-11-17vs Fell - SHLWon 21
W#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Maureen Proctor vs Emily Ioakim / Denise Wilson6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLynda Shald / Amelia Gandy vs Leigh Causey / Sarah Marsden4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Maria Hicks vs Tina Corbin / Jessica Gonterman6-2, 6-3
2022-11-14vs McCrory - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesDodi Stringfellow / Ive Marsach vs Susan Davis / Emma Graf6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesCherie Tan / Tori Baker vs Omitope Taylor / Katie Reeves6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-10-27vs Wilson - RS HardWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Schluter / Cherie Tan vs Jeannette Fabbro / Michelle Patterson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmelia Gandy / Dodi Stringfellow vs Thuy Nguyen / Megan Frederick2-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Combo 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Shannon Schluter
published
3.89
Ive Marsach
published 4
Cherie Krohn
published 4
3.48
Amelia Gandy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.43
Cherie Tan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.23
Dodi Stringfellow
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.92
Tori Baker
published
2.83
Melissa Caster
published
Maria Hicks
published
Olivia Malone
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cherie Tan + Dodi Stringfellow361560% games−3.0% vs expected
Amelia Gandy + Dodi Stringfellow224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shannon Schluter
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Ive Marsach
3W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Cherie Krohn
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Amelia Gandy
77W–56L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Cherie Tan
146W–59L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%70%30%
3.43
3.5
Dodi Stringfellow
120W–64L career · 4 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Tori Baker
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
74%26%<1%
2.92
Melissa Caster
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%90%9%
2.83
Maria Hicks
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Olivia Malone
3W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.