Teams

Edwards

2026 Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 7.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-03-29vs KochWon 21
W#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / Brooke Davidson vs Marie Sokoloff / Ken Mitchell4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKenneth Lay / Julie Fisher vs Cindee Smith / Mike Kelly6-2, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrett Salkeld / Erin McVeigh vs Greg Koch / Karen Yannone1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-22vs Terminetters 7.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Fisher / Kenneth Lay vs Michael Bernhard / Aklil Getachew6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShaun Edwards / Megan Roberts vs Roshni Fifadra / Matthew Kreuch6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStephanie Mackowiak / John Varney vs Samantha Garritano / Charles Mandeville2-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs FarooqSplit 11
W#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / Cyndi Casey vs James Smith / Kathleen Cullins7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBryan Holden / Erin McVeigh vs Gail Poole-Vaughn / Benjamin Vaughn1-6, 3-6
2026-03-15vs RothsteinWon 20
W#1 DoublesShaun Edwards / Cyndi Casey vs Russell Hester / Yngrid Sierra6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKenneth Lay / Megan Roberts vs Jonathan Marcus / Denise Mangalino6-1, 6-3
2026-03-13vs Terminetters 7.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesKenneth Lay / Erin McVeigh vs Kellie Gough McLendon / Santiago Rubiano6-0, 7-6
2026-03-06vs Ball Strikers 7.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCyndi Casey / Kenneth Lay vs Ty Sanders / Lisa Mulholland2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKory Barrett / Erin McVeigh vs Cindy Keegan / Andy Little6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesShaun Edwards / Megan Roberts vs Jorge Paucar / Kimberly Walko6-3, 6-1
2026-02-02vs Conroy/ForbesLost 12
L#1 DoublesBryan Holden / Brooke Davidson vs Kelsey Forbes / Jordan Cooper2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrett Salkeld / Megan Roberts vs Michael Witting / Kaye Witting6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesStephanie Mackowiak / Leif Glynn vs Aine McKee / Mark Wang1-6, 2-6
2026-02-01vs KochLost 12
L#1 DoublesCyndi Casey / Kenneth Lay vs Belinda McLean / Frank von Hendricks2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Roberts / Shaun Edwards vs Greg Koch / Karen Yannone3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesStephanie Mackowiak / Leif Glynn vs Cindee Smith / Scott A Green7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2026-01-11vs FarooqWon 21
L#1 DoublesKenneth Lay / Erin McVeigh vs Kim Neiss / Dan Albrecht4-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKory Barrett / Julie Fisher vs Jamie Strickler / Gail Poole-Vaughn3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesStephanie Mackowiak / John Varney vs Wing Chau / Ellicia Chau3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Mixed 18 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Stephanie Mackowiak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.46
Brooke Davidson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Erin McVeigh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.32
Kenneth Lay
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.27
Shaun Edwards
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Brett Salkeld
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Bryan Holden
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.13
Cyndi Casey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.75
John Varney
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.71
Julie Fisher
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kory Barrett
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Leif Glynn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Mackowiak + John Varney5258% gamesnot enough data
Kenneth Lay + Cyndi Casey134 matchesnot enough data
Erin McVeigh + John Varney134 matchesnot enough data
Kenneth Lay + Erin McVeigh213 matchesnot enough data
Cyndi Casey + Shaun Edwards213 matchesnot enough data
Shaun Edwards + Megan Roberts303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Stephanie Mackowiak
72W–47L career · 8 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
3.64
3.5
Brooke Davidson
16W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
3.46
3.5
Erin McVeigh
101W–83L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
Kenneth Lay
10W–10L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.32
Shaun Edwards
16W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Brett Salkeld
1W–1L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Bryan Holden
0W–5L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.23
3.5
Cyndi Casey
66W–56L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3
John Varney
14W–18L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
3
Julie Fisher
22W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Kory Barrett
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Leif Glynn
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Megan Roberts
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.