Teams

Team Dunes-Hutch

2025 KS Tri Level · Women's Low Tri 3.0-4.0

11 players · average NTRP 2.75 / KANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-10-05vs WhiteLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Bechtel / Addi White vs Julie Kice / Linda Jones6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNikki Hutton / Erin Ontjes vs Paula Bette / Alisa Franco1-6, 0-6
2025-10-05vs WhiteLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Bechtel / Addi White vs Linda Jones / Julie Kice6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBecky Carder / Erica Long vs Paula Bette / Alisa Franco1-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs Power-SalinaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAddi White / Julie Allen vs Allison Heigele / Clarissa Steele3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErica Long / Erin Ontjes vs Dana Huffaker / Shelly Power1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCarissa Jackson / Anna Conklin vs Bailee Norton / Kim Disberger0-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs Power-SalinaLost 03
L#1 DoublesAddi White / Erica Long vs Allison Heigele / Clarissa Steele2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNikki Hutton / Laura Engelland vs Shelly Power / Dana Huffaker0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Carder / Kelly Anne Lanham vs Bailee Norton / Kim Disberger0-6, 0-6
2025-09-21vs ThompsonLost 12
W#1 DoublesAddi White / Laura Bechtel vs Melanie Joseph / Paris Cunningham7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesErica Long / Julie Allen vs Megan Salas / MJ Sharp0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesNikki Hutton / Carissa Jackson vs Katie Piampiano / Bobbie Lee1-6, 1-6
2025-09-21vs ThompsonLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura Bechtel / Addi White vs Briana Nelson / CARY MORRIS1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNikki Hutton / Erica Long vs Patricia Thompson / Katie Piampiano0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJulie Allen / Addi White vs Kristen Wolf / Lesli WongToubassi1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Ontjes / Laura Engelland vs Michelle Albracht / Laurie Newton1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCarissa Jackson / Kimberley Kincaid vs Lindsay Hartnett / Andrea Baalmann0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesLaura Engelland / Addi White vs Kristen Wolf / Lesli WongToubassi1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErica Long / Kelly Anne Lanham vs Lindsay Hartnett / Robin Bieker1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesBecky Carder / Anna Conklin vs Michelle Albracht / Andrea Baalmann0-6, 0-6
2025-08-31vs Double ShotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesErica Long / Addi White vs Cathy Rinehart / Destiny MacE0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKelly Anne Lanham / Julie Allen vs Dana Hill / Kathleen Bagwell0-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCarissa Jackson / Anna Conklin vs Erica Combs / NOURA ABBAS0-6, 0-6
2025-08-31vs Double ShotsLost 03
L#1 DoublesJulie Allen / Addi White vs Cathy Rinehart / Destiny MacE2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesErica Long / Erin Ontjes vs Dana Hill / Lindsey McClung1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Anne Lanham / Carissa Jackson vs Joni Duran / Erica Combs1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · Women's Low Tri 3.0-4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KS/ToubassiSeitz/WomensTriLevel3.0-4.09121926224
2Power-Salina55181228227
3Thompson55171329251
4Team Dunes-Hutch01032754328

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Laura Bechtel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Addi White
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Anna Conklin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Becky Carder
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Carissa Jackson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Erica Long
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Erin Ontjes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kelly Anne Lanham
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Kimberley Kincaid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Engelland
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Nikki Hutton
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Bechtel + Addi White134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Bechtel
7W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Addi White
1W–9L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Anna Conklin
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Becky Carder
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
Carissa Jackson
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erica Long
0W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Erin Ontjes
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kelly Anne Lanham
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberley Kincaid
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Laura Engelland
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nikki Hutton
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.