Teams

SGV ATCC Phoenix-Sheehy-ATCC/SA4

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

18 players · average NTRP 2.92 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-12-13vs WC SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SU8Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Yi / Cynthia Jordan vs Jan Li / Oraer Pluta3-6, 6-7
W#1 DoublesJulie Thomson / Colleen Bates vs Karen Davis / Wilda Pong6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCynthia Jordan / TONI GITTER vs Deborah Beveridge / Jayme Magallanes6-2, 7-5
W#3 DoublesYvette Kopoushian / Debbie Turner vs Kerry Tribe / Kirsten Everberg6-3, 6-0
2025-11-08vs SGV Deuces Wild-Shen-Scholl/SU11Won 21
L#1 DoublesJaime Stoney / Yvette Kopoushian vs Jackie Larsen / Kaihong Su1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJulie Thomson / Victoria McGregor vs Austen Rachlis / Melicia Shen6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJulie Sheehy / Carly Crouch vs Jennifer Win / Diane Wai6-0, 6-1
2025-11-01vs SGV Hot Tub Part Deuce-Nowacki-WNWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulie Thomson / Colleen Bates vs Noanie Rofoli / Moira Demos6-3, 6-3
L#1 DoublesCindy McCarthy / Claire Jarashow vs Ariana Garcia / Adriana Higuera4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJaime Stoney / Yvette Kopoushian vs Samantha De La Rosa / Corinda Hayes1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesTONI GITTER / Julie Sheehy vs Vanessa Vanda / Kathy Ochoa1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJackie Yi / Claire Jarashow vs Irma Martinez / Camila Leon3-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJackie Yi / Elizabeth Woo vs Lisa Hawkins / Jill Tomich0-6, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.91
Claire Jarashow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Jackie Yi
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Cindy McCarthy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Colleen Bates
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.74
Cynthia Jordan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Elizabeth Woo
published
2.72
Jennifer Wilkinson
published
2.69
Julie Thomson
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.51
Jaime Stoney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.44
Tiffany Ewing
published
2.44
Yvette Kopoushian
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.40
TONI GITTER
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Nicole Fahey
published
2.23
Carly Crouch
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Hilary Scofield
published
Julie Sheehy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Spiegel
published
Victoria McGregor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

TONI GITTER + Cynthia Jordan134 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Woo + Cynthia Jordan213 matchesnot enough data
Nicole Fahey + Jennifer Wilkinson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Claire Jarashow
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
3
Jackie Yi
39W–37L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cindy McCarthy
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3
Colleen Bates
2W–0L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cynthia Jordan
6W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
4%92%3%
2.74
Elizabeth Woo
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%4%96%
2.74
Jennifer Wilkinson
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%92%2%
2.72
Julie Thomson
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.69
Jaime Stoney
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
47%53%<1%
2.51
Tiffany Ewing
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
2.44
Yvette Kopoushian
2W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
TONI GITTER
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
77%23%<1%
2.40
Nicole Fahey
0W–8L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
2.35
2.5
Carly Crouch
3W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
0%97%3%
2.23
Hilary Scofield
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Sheehy
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Spiegel
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Victoria McGregor
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.