Teams

SD 3.0 Coronado TC/ Nelson (2:2)

2022 Adult 40 & Over Winter - SD · SD - Women - WD 3.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SAN DIEGO

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-03-22vs SD LLW 3.0 Mountain View/ IbarraLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmy Lloyd / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs NANA WILLIAMS / Hikari Blancarte2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-03-14vs SD 3.0 Peninsula/ Gamara (3:1)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKylie McNall / Carisa Hackworth vs Michelle VANN / Malinda Marsh4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-02-28vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Yu-Hansen (2:2)Won 10
W#2 DoublesKaterina Hart / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Laurie Peet / Helen Smoole6-2, 6-2
2022-02-07vs SD LLW 3.0 Mountain View/ IbarraLost 01
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Dahlgren / Claudia Nelson vs CRISTINA CORONA / Monica Valenzuela2-6, 1-6
2022-01-24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAmy Holzer / Tabitha Anderson vs Lauren Olson / Sarah Blumenthal1-6, 0-6
2022-01-17vs SD 3.0 SDTRC/ Yu-Hansen (2:2)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesClaudia Nelson / Elizabeth Dahlgren vs Nancy Swirhun / Helen Smoole4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SD - Women - WD 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Katerina Hart
published 4
3.62
Sarah Kimball
published
3.37
Elizabeth Dahlgren
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Meagan McKissick
published
3.15
Erin Enrico
published 3.5
2.96
Carisa Hackworth
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Amy Holzer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.76
Claudia Nelson
published 3
Kelly Mineo
published
Tara Toohey
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carisa Hackworth + Amy Holzer3352% gamesnot enough data
Erin Enrico + Elizabeth Dahlgren123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Katerina Hart
73W–58L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Sarah Kimball
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
3.5
Elizabeth Dahlgren
85W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.37
Meagan McKissick
7W–3L career · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
3.5
Erin Enrico
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3
Carisa Hackworth
45W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Amy Holzer
80W–104L career · 1 line in 2022
1%93%6%
2.80
3
Claudia Nelson
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
2.76
Kelly Mineo
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tara Toohey
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.