Teams

Anders

2024 FW Tri-Level · Mens 3.5-4.0-4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-11-06vs TraveraLost 01
L#2 DoublesJackie Tran / Loc Spann-Ly vs Christopher Gloyna / Jeremy Penner3-6, 2-6
2024-11-03vs KanchiLost 12
W#1 DoublesJim Sanger / James Monroe vs Alan Liao / Irfan Zobayed6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesScott Anders / Daniel Zamora vs Vinhthuy Nguyen / Caleb Gentry3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesLoc Spann-Ly / Jackie Tran vs Davis Huynh / Ammon Lutz7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2024-11-02vs TraveraLost 12
L#1 DoublesTony Le / Cuong To vs Wade Morgan / Roger Pham3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJamelle Roberts / Jim Sanger vs Christopher Gloyna / Donovan Rivera7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesDaniel Zamora / Jackie Tran vs Jesus Munoz / Esteban Kim7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cuong To
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.93
Thomas Fagley
published
3.77
Jamelle Roberts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Jim Sanger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.49
Tony Le
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jackie Tran
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Gage Austin
published 3.5
3.06
Daniel Zamora
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Loc Spann-Ly
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Fagley + Jim Sanger9259% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cuong To
0W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Fagley
21W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
3.93
4
Jamelle Roberts
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Jim Sanger
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.75
Tony Le
19W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
54%46%<1%
3.49
3.5
Jackie Tran
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3.5
Gage Austin
0W–8L career · type A · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Daniel Zamora
13W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
3.06
Loc Spann-Ly
1W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.