Teams

SDNC 3.5 La Costa/ Nero

2024 SoCal Fall Doubles SDNC WE · SDNC Men 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-11-17vs SDNC LLW 3.5 Kit Carson/ WarrenLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrendan Hayes / Alex Schardt vs Anang Chokshi / Andrew Stoen3-6, 4-6
2024-10-27vs SDNC 3.5 RPTC/ PatwardhanLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlex Schardt / Brendan Hayes vs Murali Peram / Sanjiv Madan0-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs SDNC 3.5 The Crosby (2:1)/ SelbstWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrendan Hayes / Alex Schardt vs Rethna Pulikkoonattu / Keith Chin6-3, 6-3
2024-09-08Won 10
W#1 DoublesBrendan Hayes / Alex Schardt vs Robert Meyer / Mark Anderson6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Alex Schardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Jon Murphy
published
3.34
Eric Straus
published 3.5
3.25
Tim Holl
published
Brian Zender
published 3.5
3.24
Steve Carmichael
published
3.22
Brendan Hayes
published 3.5
3.20
Robert Laplante
published
3.19
Nicholas Esayian
published
3.13
Arthur Karell
published 3.5
3.08
Christopher Nero
published 3.5
3.08
Gregory Tibbitts
published 3.5
2.71
Philip Price
published
Oded Shezifi
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alex Schardt + Brendan Hayes4448% games+4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alex Schardt
48W–33L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
Jon Murphy
9W–9L career · no lines in 2024
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Eric Straus
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%88%12%
3.34
Tim Holl
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Brian Zender
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Carmichael
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Brendan Hayes
7W–13L career · no lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.22
Robert Laplante
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
Nicholas Esayian
2W–6L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Arthur Karell
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%<1%
3.13
3.5
Christopher Nero
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Gregory Tibbitts
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.08
Philip Price
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
99%1%<1%
2.71
Oded Shezifi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.