Teams

A to Z Tennis Team

2025 Mixed 18 & Over · 8.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-02vs Full Metal RacketLost 02
L#1 DoublesRey Nino Estrella / Saharra McKee vs Joseph Hout / Triin Minton6-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Allen Clendaniel vs Jay Green / ELIZE Rumley6-7, 1-6
2025-03-01vs Court JestersWon 30
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Larson / Saharra McKee vs Kati Renfro / Fogarty Burton6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / April Korshin vs Daniel Ogden / Nancy Burton6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesRey Nino Estrella / Zareena Clendaniel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-22vs Katie's KittiesLost 03
L#1 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Allen Clendaniel vs Allison Erickson / Derek Stone0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSaharra McKee / Todd Takeno vs Katrina Brown / Jeremy Conkling5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBridget Powers / Anthony Brooks vs Katherine Curry / Phuripak Sukanthanag0-6, 4-6
2025-02-15vs All Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesApril Korshin / Dane Markell vs James Robinson / Sarah Gillstrom2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Larson / Saharra McKee vs Natalie Meyeraan / Arne Krogh6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Bridget Powers vs Jessie Lief / Garrett Danner6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Full Metal RacketLost 02
L#1 DoublesAllen Clendaniel / Zareena Clendaniel vs John Carlson / Triin Minton1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnthony Brooks / Saharra McKee vs Joseph Hout / ELIZE Rumley4-6, 1-6
2025-02-02vs Katie's KittiesLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Griffin / Anthony Brooks vs Katrina Brown / Jeremy Conkling1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesApril Korshin / Dane Markell vs Daniella DeLozier / Ryan Jaramillo1-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesSaharra McKee / Benjamin Larson vs Katherine Curry / Daniel Whitfield6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-01-12vs Court JestersWon 30
W#1 DoublesDana Griffin / Dane Markell vs Jen Strickland / Daniel Ogden6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSaharra McKee / Rey Nino Estrella vs Joseph Schmid / Kati Renfro6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Benjamin Larson vs Nancy Burton / Fogarty Burton6-1, 6-0
2025-01-12vs All Mixed UpLost 12
L#1 DoublesDana Griffin / Dane Markell vs James Robinson / Natalie Meyeraan3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTodd Takeno / April Korshin vs Garrett Danner / Sarah Gillstrom6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesRey Nino Estrella / Saharra McKee vs Nicolle Welch / Arne Krogh1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Katie's Kitties802138116
2Full Metal Racket53131124196
3A to Z Tennis Team2691531211

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
April Korshin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Dane Markell
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Saharra McKee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Benjamin Larson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Allen Clendaniel
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.57
Bridget Powers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.48
Rey Nino Estrella
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Zareena Clendaniel
usually #2 Doubles 39%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3.5
3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.02
Anthony Brooks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Todd Takeno
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allen Clendaniel + April Korshin8261% gamesnot enough data
Allen Clendaniel + Zareena Clendaniel01029% gamesnot enough data
April Korshin + Anthony Brooks4648% gamesnot enough data
Dana Griffin + Anthony Brooks1641% gamesnot enough data
Dana Griffin + Zareena Clendaniel314 matchesnot enough data
Saharra McKee + Anthony Brooks314 matchesnot enough data
Rey Nino Estrella + Zareena Clendaniel314 matchesnot enough data
Dana Griffin + Saharra McKee213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Korshin
113W–101L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Dane Markell
61W–29L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Saharra McKee
50W–33L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Benjamin Larson
19W–12L career · type M · 8 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Allen Clendaniel
84W–53L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.75
4
Bridget Powers
3W–7L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Rey Nino Estrella
9W–10L career · 10 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
58W–96L career · type M · 13 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 7 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.06
3.5
Anthony Brooks
110W–108L career · 6 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Todd Takeno
13W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.