Teams

Harlingen - JP

2024 NA Valley Adult 18 & Over 2.5 M - 5.0 M - Fall · 4.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-10-15vs Mission - AdrianLost 04
L#1 DoublesNathan Solis / Javier Lozano vs RODRIGO GARCIA / Richard Castillo0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesDiego Salazar vs Manuel Garcia1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLuis Alvarez / Juan Sauceda vs Diego Setien / Edgar Jose Zavala Orozco4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesZachary Gonzalez vs Nicholas Houghton1-6, 1-6
2024-10-10vs Mission - BoLost 13
L#1 DoublesCarson Wick / Roland Ingram vs Stevan Guarneri / David Rodriguez2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGavin Lerma / Diego Salazar vs Luciano Ibarra / Daniel Cabrera3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesZachary Gonzalez vs Bo Ranson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJoel Pallapati / Javier Lozano vs Andres Rodriguez / Ramiro Montemayor6-2, 6-3
2024-10-03vs Mission - BarryLost 23
L#1 DoublesJACK WICK / Zachary Gonzalez vs Manuel Gonzalez / Margill Flores3-6
W#1 SinglesJavier Lozano vs Juan Garcia7-5
L#2 DoublesJuan Sauceda / Gavin Lerma vs John Newman / Fernando Mora2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesCarson Wick vs Barry Jones6-0, 6-4
L#3 DoublesDiego Salazar / Joel Pallapati vs Ricardo Benavides / Daniel Lopez0-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Carson Wick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 4
3.74
Gavin Lerma
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.72
Nathan Solis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Juan Sauceda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.61
Zachary Gonzalez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Javier Lozano
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.54
Diego Salazar
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.40
JACK WICK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Joel Pallapati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roland Ingram
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zachary Gonzalez + JACK WICK044 matchesnot enough data
Carson Wick + JACK WICK033 matchesnot enough data
Juan Sauceda + Javier Lozano213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carson Wick
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
Gavin Lerma
8W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Nathan Solis
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
6%92%2%
3.72
Juan Sauceda
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.65
Zachary Gonzalez
4W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.61
Javier Lozano
5W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.58
4
Diego Salazar
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.54
JACK WICK
0W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
75%25%<1%
3.40
Joel Pallapati
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Roland Ingram
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.