Teams

3-JRosen-CHCC

2022 Eno River Combo 18 & Over · Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-10-05vs 1-DHertzog-HVCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMeghan Burns / Lindsay Roofe Lavin vs Karen Rabenau / Kate Walton4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberly Jeffs / Mignon Lunsford vs Belen Diaz Cisneros / Ashley Perry1-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-23Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Roofe Lavin / Adrian Davies vs Amanda Birrenkott / Jennifer Gates-Foster2-6, 3-6
2022-09-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesAdrian Davies / Pippa Englert vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-09-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTracy Davies / Adrian Davies vs Samantha Terhune / Amanda Birrenkott4-6, 1-6
2022-08-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLindsay Roofe Lavin / Mignon Lunsford vs Valerie Michael / Belen Diaz Cisneros4-6, 2-6
2022-08-12vs 2-LKieffer-UNCWon 10
W#2 DoublesLindsay Roofe Lavin / Kelley Greer vs Holly Madariaga / LAURIE KIEFFER6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 18 & Over Combo 2.5 Women Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Lynn Furgurson
published
3.02
Mignon Lunsford
published 3
2.95
Meghan Burns
published
2.90
Kimberly Jeffs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Jennifer Rosen
published
2.73
Adrian Davies
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Lindsay Roofe Lavin
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.68
Meredith Fitch
published
2.60
2.19
Pippa Englert
published
Barbara van Leeuwen
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Adrian Davies + Lindsay Roofe Lavin4253% gamesnot enough data
Adrian Davies + Kimberly Jeffs224 matchesnot enough data
Kimberly Jeffs + Meghan Burns303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lynn Furgurson
21W–14L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
3
Mignon Lunsford
55W–39L career · no lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.02
Meghan Burns
17W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Kimberly Jeffs
37W–37L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%79%21%
2.90
Jennifer Rosen
15W–12L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Adrian Davies
48W–34L career · 3 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
2.5
Lindsay Roofe Lavin
33W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
0%7%93%
2.69
Meredith Fitch
19W–11L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
2.68
3
Courtney Yarbrough
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
21%78%<1%
2.60
Pippa Englert
8W–10L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Barbara van Leeuwen
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.