Teams

1-CLee-HS

2022 Eno River Combo 40 & Over · Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening

7 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-10-04vs 5-COMBO-Bland-CHTCWon 10
W#3 DoublesMichael Holt / Valdis Stiebris vs Mitch Kleiman / Kurt Rosenkrantz6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-09-20Won 10
W#3 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Will Johnson vs Steve Berntsen / Phil Nobile7-6, 6-4
2022-09-18vs 5-COMBO-Bland-CHTCLost 02
L#2 DoublesChris Lee / Dirk Kumashiro vs Donovan Khamphasong / Mark Bland1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / David Nagelhout vs Robert Kern / Jay Bauer3-6, 1-6
2022-09-13vs 3-RLong--CCC-40 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDirk Kumashiro / Will Johnson vs JAMES MONTAGUE / Travis Angle2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / David Nagelhout vs Robert Long / Omid Uskowi6-2, 6-4
2022-09-06vs 4-AYoung-EV-6.5-Combo-40+Won 20
W#1 DoublesDirk Kumashiro / Chris Lee vs Carl Laird / Lee Goldberg7-6, 7-6
W#3 DoublesValdis Stiebris / David Nagelhout vs Neal Sugg / Marvin Davis6-4, 6-4
2022-08-16vs 2-DNaden-HSLost 01
L#1 DoublesDavid Nagelhout / Hayes Hofler vs Scott Hartman / Chris Konvalinka0-6, 0-6
2022-08-09vs 4-AYoung-EV-6.5-Combo-40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesChris Lee / Dirk Kumashiro vs Christopher DeFusco / Chris Reeves3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesValdis Stiebris / Hayes Hofler vs Leon Grodski Barrera / Marvin Davis2-6, 6-7
2022-08-02vs 3-RLong--CCC-40 6.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesDirk Kumashiro / Will Johnson vs Arash Chehrazi / JAMES MONTAGUE6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesIan Lockwood / Valdis Stiebris vs Brent Fox / Chuck Clark6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Eno River 40 & Over Combo 6.5 Men Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Michael Holt
published
3.10
Valdis Stiebris
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.06
David Stefan
published 3.5
2.73
Dirk Kumashiro
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.69
Hayes Hofler
published 3
2.62
David Nagelhout
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Cory Draughon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Valdis Stiebris + David Nagelhout314 matchesnot enough data
Valdis Stiebris + Dirk Kumashiro123 matchesnot enough data
Dirk Kumashiro + David Nagelhout123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Holt
11W–10L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Valdis Stiebris
57W–72L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
David Stefan
3W–15L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Dirk Kumashiro
41W–53L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Hayes Hofler
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
2.69
3
David Nagelhout
44W–55L career · 5 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
2.62
Cory Draughon
2W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.