Teams

MVH Enge FWL M18-8.0X

2023 WMI FWL USTA League Mixed 18&Over Weekend Leagues · WMI FWL M18&O 8.0 X (6 player)

14 players · average NTRP 4.19 / WESTERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-12-10vs WH Millet FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesArin Enge / Andrea Wolfe vs Marjori Cantwell / Alex Muresan7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTed Diedrich / Ashley Diedrich vs Charles Krug / Lauren Worgess4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesMarion Rischmann / Kevin Loftis vs Nichole Watts / Greg Watts7-5, 6-1
2022-12-04vs MC Hutton FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesHeidi Hendricks / Jose Vivas vs Audrey Saliga / Deon Stein7-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Tomas Yacuzio vs Sarah Abramson / Daniel Hillman6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAmber Slater / Chuong Dang vs Diana Schimpf / John Schimpf1-6, 2-6
2022-11-13vs PA Lamphier FWL M18-8.0XWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Chuong Dang vs Kristen Woodward / Andrei Corneanu4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Arin Enge vs Elizabeth Patrick / Scott Arlen6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAshley Diedrich / Ted Diedrich vs Jasmine Irish / Patrick Irish6-4, 6-2
2022-10-09vs MVS Klingenberg FWL M18-8.0XWon 21
W#1 DoublesArin Enge / Andrea Wolfe vs Clayton Hodge / Danielle Juhle6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesAmber Slater / Daniel Huan vs Trent Pontious / Deanri Human3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesKevin Loftis / Marion Rischmann vs Daniel Bragg / Debbie Buchan3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-09-25vs MVH O'Bryant FWL M18-8.0XWon 30
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Daniel Huan vs Marty McKenna / Emily Oosterhouse6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmber Slater / Chuong Dang vs Steven Podgurski / Tanya Gonzalez7-6, 4-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeidi Hendricks / Jose Vivas vs Albert O'Bryant / Yvonne Boucher6-2, 6-3
2022-09-11vs PA Johnson FWL M18-8.0XLost 12
W#1 DoublesBecky Musgraves / Daniel Huan vs Long Vu / Emi Mueller7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAndrea Wolfe / Arin Enge vs Sara Johnson / Jarrod Brower6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSommer Dockery / Tomas Yacuzio vs Casey Tjalsma / Madeline Staal4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · WMI FWL M18&O 8.0 X (6 player)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1PA Johnson FWL M18-8.0X5113511134
2MVH Enge FWL M18-8.0X5113513153
3WH Millet FWL M18-8.0X429922168
4MVS Klingenberg FWL M18-8.0X3311715137
5MVH O'Bryant FWL M18-8.0X3371125176
6MC Hutton FWL M18-8.0X1571125183
7PA Lamphier FWL M18-8.0X0631532197

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.30
Heidi Hendricks
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.28
Marion Rischmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.26
Daniel Huan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Arin Enge
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.04
Becky Musgraves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.82
Ashley Diedrich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
Chuong Dang
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Ted Diedrich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.60
Kevin Loftis
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Amber Slater
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.49
Jose Vivas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Andrea Wolfe
published 3.5
3.12
Sommer Dockery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tomas Yacuzio
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Wolfe + Arin Enge14260% games+12.7% vs expected
Ted Diedrich + Ashley Diedrich41542% games−5.8% vs expected
Daniel Huan + Becky Musgraves6070% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Hendricks + Jose Vivas213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Heidi Hendricks
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
4.30
Marion Rischmann
49W–17L career · 2 lines in 2023
2%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Daniel Huan
69W–22L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%3%
4.26
4.5
Arin Enge
25W–10L career · type M · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
4.5
Becky Musgraves
137W–79L career · 3 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Ashley Diedrich
120W–96L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Chuong Dang
27W–23L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ted Diedrich
25W–45L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Kevin Loftis
57W–33L career · 6 lines in 2023
21%78%<1%
3.60
4
Amber Slater
80W–132L career · 5 lines in 2023
30%70%<1%
3.57
Jose Vivas
42W–47L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
3.49
3.5
Andrea Wolfe
52W–76L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sommer Dockery
26W–45L career · 1 line in 2023
17%82%<1%
3.12
Tomas Yacuzio
14W–12L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.