Teams

Volley Llamas

2025 OKCMixed 40 & Over League · 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-12vs OKWC/Joyce/mixed 40&over 6.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesPeter Ram / Monica Ramsperger vs William Puffinbarger / Nikola Puffinbarger6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCandler Barnett / Emily Shanbour vs David Teague / Andrea Miller6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesMichael Miller / Rebecca Wint vs Kirk Purnell / Shannon Purnell2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-09vs TiebreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesLynn Pinaroc / Nes Pinaroc vs Chad Miller / Christina von Hahmann2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCandler Barnett / Emily Shanbour vs Donna Pruitt / Ryan Barnett7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesTodd Scherm / Monica Ramsperger vs Shawn Churchman / Marilyn Morris2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-11-17vs declined: Castner-10s ACES 40Lost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Ram / Peter Ram vs Leroy Cantrell / Marina Martinez2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Monica Ramsperger vs Raylan Jennings / Leslie Robinson1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesHector Portillo / Emily Shanbour vs Rafael Martinez / Susan Bouzerand6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2024-11-14vs TiebreakersLost 12
L#1 DoublesShawn Dillon / Amy Dillon vs Amy Pyles / David Ellis1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNes Pinaroc / Monica Ramsperger vs Chad Miller / Judy Ellsworth6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKathleen Ram / Todd Scherm vs Alisa Ratzlaff / John Mark Aylor6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-10-27vs OKWC/Joyce/mixed 40&over 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesCandler Barnett / Rebecca Wint vs Mac Lazarus / Shannon Purnell3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKathleen Ram / Peter Ram vs Michael Garrison / Danielle Coats3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHector Portillo / Emily Shanbour vs Kirk Purnell / Andrea Miller6-3, 6-1
2024-10-13vs declined: Castner-10s ACES 40Lost 12
L#1 DoublesShawn Dillon / Amy Dillon vs Rafael Martinez / Diane Little1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCandler Barnett / Rebecca Wint vs Gustavo Hernandez / Marina Martinez5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHector Portillo / Emily Shanbour vs Dan Reyna-Gilley / Roxy Castner6-1, 6-3
2024-10-03vs OKWC/Joyce/mixed 40&over 6.0Won 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Dillon / Nes Pinaroc vs David Teague / Kelly Moody6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Rebecca Wint vs Michael Garrison / Danielle Coats6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKathleen Ram / Peter Ram vs Nikola Puffinbarger / John Joyce6-3, 6-3
2024-09-29vs TiebreakersWon 21
L#1 DoublesTodd Scherm / Lynn Pinaroc vs Amy Pyles / David Ellis0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesCandler Barnett / Monica Ramsperger vs Jana Anderson / Josh Moore6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHector Portillo / Emily Shanbour vs Chad Miller / Donna Pruitt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-08vs declined: Castner-10s ACES 40Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPeter Ram / Kathleen Ram vs Jeremy Woodie / Roxy Castner6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMichael Miller / Monica Ramsperger vs Eric Nazim / Fabiola Hernandez3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmy Dillon / Hector Portillo vs Gustavo Hernandez / Jackie Nazim0-6, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.92
Hector Portillo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.84
Nes Pinaroc
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.80
Candler Barnett
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.78
Peter Ram
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.61
Rebecca Wint
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Lynn Pinaroc
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Amy Dillon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.31
Emily Shanbour
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kathleen Ram
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Monica Ramsperger
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Shawn Dillon
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Todd Scherm
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Ram + Peter Ram4355% games+5.2% vs expected
Emily Shanbour + Candler Barnett1740% games+5.0% vs expected
Nes Pinaroc + Lynn Pinaroc2838% gamesnot enough data
Amy Dillon + Shawn Dillon1634% gamesnot enough data
Peter Ram + Monica Ramsperger1543% gamesnot enough data
Hector Portillo + Emily Shanbour404 matchesnot enough data
Peter Ram + Emily Shanbour044 matchesnot enough data
Todd Scherm + Rebecca Wint134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Hector Portillo
7W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
72%28%<1%
2.92
Nes Pinaroc
42W–64L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Candler Barnett
25W–41L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
Peter Ram
33W–77L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Rebecca Wint
23W–35L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%21%79%
2.61
Lynn Pinaroc
34W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
2.52
2.5
Amy Dillon
28W–68L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%72%28%
2.42
Emily Shanbour
35W–52L career · 6 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.31
Kathleen Ram
37W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Monica Ramsperger
6W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shawn Dillon
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Scherm
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.