Teams

WOB:Diamond Dogs:Ow/Delay

2023 EMA Adult 40 & Over Men · 4.0 Men

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / EASTERN MASSACHUSETTS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Richard Leaf
published
3.79
Daniel DeLay
published 4
3.78
Antonio Martinez
published 4
3.71
Arnold Lee
published 4
3.59
Gagan Achar
published
Amit Nene
published
Mark Charney
published
Nuno SaCouto
published
Richard Ow
published
Rob Edwards
published
Rob Park
published
Sal Giglia
published
Sang Nguyen
published
Steven Eggleston
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cesarfloyd Aldana + Daniel DeLay9360% games+5.2% vs expected
Sang Nguyen + Richard Leaf4350% gamesnot enough data
Richard Ow + Daniel DeLay2442% gamesnot enough data
Daniel DeLay + Nuno SaCouto1546% gamesnot enough data
Richard Ow + Arnold Lee044 matchesnot enough data
Cesarfloyd Aldana + Arnold Lee033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Leaf
28W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
4
Daniel DeLay
115W–89L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Cesarfloyd Aldana
38W–35L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Antonio Martinez
22W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Arnold Lee
35W–37L career · no lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.71
Gagan Achar
16W–6L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Amit Nene
12W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Charney
9W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nuno SaCouto
23W–25L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Ow
43W–49L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Edwards
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rob Park
64W–61L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sal Giglia
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sang Nguyen
38W–16L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Eggleston
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.